ETAS-Positive: Extracting Unbiased Epidemic-Type Aftershock Models from Incomplete Earthquake Catalogs

ABSTRACT Earthquake catalogs are inherently incomplete, and short-term fluctuations in catalog completeness can strongly bias estimates of seismicity parameters. Here, we extend the positive statistics framework recently introduced for estimating Gutenberg–Richter a and b values to the epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model. The approach focuses on complete magnitude–time intervals defined by pairs of earthquakes in which the second event is larger than the first. Comprehensive synthetic tests demonstrate that the proposed ETAS+ method retrieves nearly unbiased parameter estimates even from highly incomplete catalogs, whereas parameters obtained using classical estimation approaches are strongly biased. Application to southern California reveals a similar trend, with the productivity scaling parameter α approaching the b value, consistent with self-similar earthquake triggering within estimation uncertainties. Owing to its robustness against catalog incompleteness and its computational efficiency, the ETAS+ method provides a powerful new tool for seismicity analysis and earthquake forecasting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120260082
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

ETAS-Positive: Extracting Unbiased Epidemic-Type Aftershock Models from Incomplete Earthquake Catalogs

N. van der Elst, Sebastian Hainzl
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

ETAS-Positive: Extracting Unbiased Epidemic-Type Aftershock Models from Incomplete Earthquake Catalogs

N. van der Elst, Sebastian Hainzl
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Earthquake catalogs are inherently incomplete, and short-term fluctuations in catalog completeness can strongly bias estimates of seismicity parameters. Here, we extend the positive statistics framework recently introduced for estimating Gutenberg–Richter a and b values to the epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model. The approach focuses on complete magnitude–time intervals defined by pairs of earthquakes in which the second event is larger than the first. Comprehensive synthetic tests demonstrate that the proposed ETAS+ method retrieves nearly unbiased parameter estimates even from highly incomplete catalogs, whereas parameters obtained using classical estimation approaches are strongly biased. Application to southern California reveals a similar trend, with the productivity scaling parameter α approaching the b value, consistent with self-similar earthquake triggering within estimation uncertainties. Owing to its robustness against catalog incompleteness and its computational efficiency, the ETAS+ method provides a powerful new tool for seismicity analysis and earthquake forecasting.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
United States Geological Survey (US), University of Potsdam (DE), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.