Application of generative artificial intelligence in clinical teaching of colorectal surgery: an exploratory cluster-randomized controlled study

To evaluate a faculty-supervised, ChatGPT-supported blended teaching model during a 4-week colorectal surgery internship. Thirty interns in four pre-existing internship groups participated between June and September 2025. An online draw assigned two groups (15 students) to conventional teaching and two (15 students) to ChatGPT-supported blended teaching. The primary educational outcome was the overall course score: 50% final theoretical examination and 50% practical examination. The practical score comprised 20% laparoscopic procedural assessment, 40% suturing, and 40% case analysis. The main analysis compared the 30 students by allocated teaching arm. A cluster-level analysis was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Mean overall scores were 76.77 (SD 3.80) in the control arm and 86.85 (SD 2.78) in the ChatGPT-supported arm. The student-level mean difference was 10.08 points (95% CI 7.58 to 12.58; P < 0.001). Holm-adjusted P values for the seven secondary outcomes ranged from < 0.001 to 0.003. In the cluster-level sensitivity analysis, the mean difference was 10.13 points (95% CI −0.19 to 20.45; exact P = 0.333). The ChatGPT-supported arm had higher short-term educational scores in the student-level analysis. Because allocation occurred in only four internship groups, the precision of this analysis may be overstated and the findings remain exploratory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-026-05231-6
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Application of generative artificial intelligence in clinical teaching of colorectal surgery: an exploratory cluster-randomized controlled study

Zhi Liu, Sanyuan Hu, Haolin Xu, Menghui Wang
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Application of generative artificial intelligence in clinical teaching of colorectal surgery: an exploratory cluster-randomized controlled study

Zhi Liu, Sanyuan Hu, Haolin Xu, Menghui Wang
article en

Abstract

To evaluate a faculty-supervised, ChatGPT-supported blended teaching model during a 4-week colorectal surgery internship. Thirty interns in four pre-existing internship groups participated between June and September 2025. An online draw assigned two groups (15 students) to conventional teaching and two (15 students) to ChatGPT-supported blended teaching. The primary educational outcome was the overall course score: 50% final theoretical examination and 50% practical examination. The practical score comprised 20% laparoscopic procedural assessment, 40% suturing, and 40% case analysis. The main analysis compared the 30 students by allocated teaching arm. A cluster-level analysis was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Mean overall scores were 76.77 (SD 3.80) in the control arm and 86.85 (SD 2.78) in the ChatGPT-supported arm. The student-level mean difference was 10.08 points (95% CI 7.58 to 12.58; P < 0.001). Holm-adjusted P values for the seven secondary outcomes ranged from < 0.001 to 0.003. In the cluster-level sensitivity analysis, the mean difference was 10.13 points (95% CI −0.19 to 20.45; exact P = 0.333). The ChatGPT-supported arm had higher short-term educational scores in the student-level analysis. Because allocation occurred in only four internship groups, the precision of this analysis may be overstated and the findings remain exploratory.

International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Weifang Medical University (CN), Weifang People's Hospital (CN), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.