Prediction Model for Intensive Care Unit Mortality in Patients with Spine Fracture: Can Machine Learning be Used to Improve Current Standards?

Abstract Background The APACHE-IV is the gold standard for ICU mortality prediction across a multitude of patient conditions. We aim to create a machine learning model to predict ICU mortality for patients with spine fracture with similar predictive capabilities as the APACHE-IV, but with fewer inputs. Study Design The MIMIC-IV and the eICU databases were queried for patients admitted to the ICU with a spine fracture. Demographics and physiological variables of each patient’s first day of ICU admission were collected. Variables with > 10% missing values were excluded, while others were imputed using K-nearest-neighbors ( k = 5). Feature selection using MIMIC-IV was performed by training an initial Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model. Eight features were selected using gain: systolic blood pressure, fiO 2 , age, spinal cord injury status, calcium, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and white blood cell count. Hyperparameter tuning was implemented using a 5-fold cross-validated grid search to optimize model performance. The model was externally tested and compared with APACHE-IV using the eICU database. Results A total of 926 patients with spine fracture in MIMIC-IV were included, with a mortality rate of 6.6%. A total of 571 patients with spinal fracture in the eICU database were included, with a mortality rate of 6.7%. Our trained XGBoost model achieved an external test area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77–0.90), area under the precision–recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.10–0.36), and Brier score of 0.041, compared with the APACHE-IV model of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78–0.91), 0.23 (95% CI: 0.11–0.38), and 0.044, respectively. Conclusions We developed an eight-variable XGBoost model to predict mortality for patients with spine fracture that performed similarly to the 37-variable APACHE-IV score when applied to a study population from the eICU dataset. Although the APACHE-IV is the most robust method for ICU mortality scoring, novel methods utilizing machine learning guided feature selection should be explored given the potential to simplify and improve on the proprietary APACHE-IV system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurocritical Care
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-026-02648-3
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Prediction Model for Intensive Care Unit Mortality in Patients with Spine Fracture: Can Machine Learning be Used to Improve Current Standards?

John Wainwright, Ariel Sacknovitz, Harshadkumar A. Patel, Maor Shir et al.
Neurocritical Care
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Prediction Model for Intensive Care Unit Mortality in Patients with Spine Fracture: Can Machine Learning be Used to Improve Current Standards?

John Wainwright, Ariel Sacknovitz, Harshadkumar A. Patel, Maor Shir, Bar Shir, Merritt D. Kinon, Matthew Blakley, Moshe Serwatien
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The APACHE-IV is the gold standard for ICU mortality prediction across a multitude of patient conditions. We aim to create a machine learning model to predict ICU mortality for patients with spine fracture with similar predictive capabilities as the APACHE-IV, but with fewer inputs. Study Design The MIMIC-IV and the eICU databases were queried for patients admitted to the ICU with a spine fracture. Demographics and physiological variables of each patient’s first day of ICU admission were collected. Variables with > 10% missing values were excluded, while others were imputed using K-nearest-neighbors ( k = 5). Feature selection using MIMIC-IV was performed by training an initial Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model. Eight features were selected using gain: systolic blood pressure, fiO 2 , age, spinal cord injury status, calcium, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and white blood cell count. Hyperparameter tuning was implemented using a 5-fold cross-validated grid search to optimize model performance. The model was externally tested and compared with APACHE-IV using the eICU database. Results A total of 926 patients with spine fracture in MIMIC-IV were included, with a mortality rate of 6.6%. A total of 571 patients with spinal fracture in the eICU database were included, with a mortality rate of 6.7%. Our trained XGBoost model achieved an external test area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77–0.90), area under the precision–recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.10–0.36), and Brier score of 0.041, compared with the APACHE-IV model of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78–0.91), 0.23 (95% CI: 0.11–0.38), and 0.044, respectively. Conclusions We developed an eight-variable XGBoost model to predict mortality for patients with spine fracture that performed similarly to the 37-variable APACHE-IV score when applied to a study population from the eICU dataset. Although the APACHE-IV is the most robust method for ICU mortality scoring, novel methods utilizing machine learning guided feature selection should be explored given the potential to simplify and improve on the proprietary APACHE-IV system.

Neurocritical Care
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.