An integrated predictive model of nurses’ disaster preparedness: the joint role of organizational resources and psychological capacity

Disaster preparedness among nurses is essential for effective emergency response. This study examined disaster preparedness and psychological disaster preparedness as related but distinct dimensions and evaluated the contribution of organizational work environment factors and psychological characteristics to both outcomes. A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted among 300 registered nurses employed at a tertiary medical center in Israel between May 2023 and May 2024. Data were collected using validated self-report questionnaires assessing disaster preparedness, psychological disaster preparedness, organizational work environment, resilience, optimism, and trait anxiety. Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and multiple regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of both preparedness outcomes. Disaster preparedness and psychological disaster preparedness were moderately correlated ( r =.56, p <.001) but showed different adjusted predictor patterns. The full disaster preparedness model explained 45.4% of the variance; workplace disaster training, optimism, lower trait anxiety, participation, staffing and resource adequacy, collegial nurse-physician relations, and completion of an advanced nursing course were positive independent correlates. The full psychological preparedness model explained 45.1% of the variance; age, ward experience, resilience, staffing and resource adequacy, nurse-nurse interaction, and male gender were positive independent correlates, whereas workplace disaster training and trait anxiety were negative correlates. Nurses’ disaster preparedness is multidimensional and reflects both organizational resources and individual psychological capacity. Organizational and psychological variables contributed jointly, but their adjusted associations differed across operational and psychological preparedness. Interventions should therefore combine adequate staffing and collaborative practice environments with disaster training that explicitly addresses psychological responses, resilience, and anxiety management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nursing
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-05264-w
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

An integrated predictive model of nurses’ disaster preparedness: the joint role of organizational resources and psychological capacity

Merav Ben Natan, Omar Afeef Wattad
BMC Nursing
Disaster Response and Management
article

An integrated predictive model of nurses’ disaster preparedness: the joint role of organizational resources and psychological capacity

Merav Ben Natan, Omar Afeef Wattad
article en

Abstract

Disaster preparedness among nurses is essential for effective emergency response. This study examined disaster preparedness and psychological disaster preparedness as related but distinct dimensions and evaluated the contribution of organizational work environment factors and psychological characteristics to both outcomes. A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted among 300 registered nurses employed at a tertiary medical center in Israel between May 2023 and May 2024. Data were collected using validated self-report questionnaires assessing disaster preparedness, psychological disaster preparedness, organizational work environment, resilience, optimism, and trait anxiety. Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and multiple regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of both preparedness outcomes. Disaster preparedness and psychological disaster preparedness were moderately correlated ( r =.56, p <.001) but showed different adjusted predictor patterns. The full disaster preparedness model explained 45.4% of the variance; workplace disaster training, optimism, lower trait anxiety, participation, staffing and resource adequacy, collegial nurse-physician relations, and completion of an advanced nursing course were positive independent correlates. The full psychological preparedness model explained 45.1% of the variance; age, ward experience, resilience, staffing and resource adequacy, nurse-nurse interaction, and male gender were positive independent correlates, whereas workplace disaster training and trait anxiety were negative correlates. Nurses’ disaster preparedness is multidimensional and reflects both organizational resources and individual psychological capacity. Organizational and psychological variables contributed jointly, but their adjusted associations differed across operational and psychological preparedness. Interventions should therefore combine adequate staffing and collaborative practice environments with disaster training that explicitly addresses psychological responses, resilience, and anxiety management.

BMC Nursing
Tel Aviv University (IL), Assuta Medical Center (IL), Hillel Yaffe Medical Center (IL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.