Potentiality as "It Depends": a Methodology on the Invariantial Binary Authorization of Host Platforms, With an Application to Infinite Regress

This paper is based on several conditions found in Axioma 412, seeking to expand on the definitions concerning the meta-meta-level abstraction of invariant potential and the concept of structural dependency by utilizing H. The author mainly attempts to interface the philosophical bottleneck of infinite contextual regress with binary logic notation (1 & 0) while simultaneously being attached to host platform H, for the purpose of representing conditional substantiation through framing contextual dependency as derived from potentiality. Potentiality is refrained from being conceived as a simple conception from the human imagination, but is rather interpreted as an appearance which aligns with the imagery of ‘nothing specific’, along with being strongly associated with the seemingly ambiguous linguistic expression of ‘it depends’. In this paper, indefiniteness such as the previous expressions comprises a description of hyper-complex nested conditions into one discrete statement built upon potentiality and which also accommodates the definability conditions of the resolution space (= existence). Correlating potentiality with binary logic values provides an opportunity for the more abstract tiers of philosophy to perform as intuitive operational injection gates. Hence, the paper attempts to formalize the general conception of potentiality by centering the subject around a vague conditional presence governing pre-resolved reality. The document refrains from defining potentiality as an elementary subject and is constructed purely to function as a philosophical authorization model or framework of thought. Keywords: Formal Semantics – Abstract Thought Machines – Axiomatic Systems Architecture – Philosophical Logic – Conceptual Engineering