Beyond the gender binary: Variation and the social meaning of rhoticity in Nigerian English

Abstract Although Nigerian English is characterized as non-rhotic, this article combines variationist and linguistic anthropological approaches to show how rhoticity (non-prevocalic /r/) is employed across different gender identities in Nigeria. Of these gender identities, attention is paid to feminine-presenting male speakers locally referred to as crossdressers. As these crossdressers are vehemently vilified in the country, this article shows how they recontextualize rhoticity as a register shibboleth (Silverstein 2017) to index American-ness that is constitutive of glamorous cosmopolitanism for purposes of indexical inoculation. The article further argues that rhoticity has colonial entailments and that it is its colonial entailments that contribute to its symbolic capital in Nigeria’s linguistic marketplace. Given that Nigerian crossdressers’ gender practices get labeled as un-African, this article also argues that transgressing normative gender practices in Nigeria may evoke coloniality, when colonial intertexts are used to resist Western colonial (bio)logics of gender ideology and African languages. (African languages, colonialism, coloniality, gender in Africa, Nigeria, Nigerian crossdressers, Nigerian English, rhoticity, social meaning, stance, variation)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language in Society
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404526102565
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Beyond the gender binary: Variation and the social meaning of rhoticity in Nigerian English

PraiseGod Aminu
Language in Society
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Beyond the gender binary: Variation and the social meaning of rhoticity in Nigerian English

PraiseGod Aminu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although Nigerian English is characterized as non-rhotic, this article combines variationist and linguistic anthropological approaches to show how rhoticity (non-prevocalic /r/) is employed across different gender identities in Nigeria. Of these gender identities, attention is paid to feminine-presenting male speakers locally referred to as crossdressers. As these crossdressers are vehemently vilified in the country, this article shows how they recontextualize rhoticity as a register shibboleth (Silverstein 2017) to index American-ness that is constitutive of glamorous cosmopolitanism for purposes of indexical inoculation. The article further argues that rhoticity has colonial entailments and that it is its colonial entailments that contribute to its symbolic capital in Nigeria’s linguistic marketplace. Given that Nigerian crossdressers’ gender practices get labeled as un-African, this article also argues that transgressing normative gender practices in Nigeria may evoke coloniality, when colonial intertexts are used to resist Western colonial (bio)logics of gender ideology and African languages. (African languages, colonialism, coloniality, gender in Africa, Nigeria, Nigerian crossdressers, Nigerian English, rhoticity, social meaning, stance, variation)

Language in Society
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.