Adverse Experiences in Brief Meditation Practices: Randomized Controlled Trial
Background Meditation has become increasingly popular in recent decades. However, relatively little remains known about the prevalence of and risk factors for adverse experiences related to a single meditation practice. Objective The objective of our study was to examine adverse experiences associated with 3 brief, digitally delivered meditation practices (mindfulness, self-compassion, and gratitude) relative to using the internet as usual, as well as to investigate whether preintervention characteristics could predict such outcomes. Methods In a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial using samples that were representative of the US and UK adult populations with regard to ethnicity, sex, and age, we examined adverse experiences associated with 3 brief (ie, 5 or 10 minutes) meditation practices (ie, mindfulness, self-compassion, and gratitude) relative to using the internet as usual. We also investigated the potential of using preintervention characteristics to predict such outcomes. Results A total of 5049 participants completed all preintervention measures and were randomly assigned to meditation or control conditions. Across the sample, 4.1% (204/4925) of participants reported having a distressing experience during the intervention, and 7.1% (348/4908) of participants experienced an increase in negative affect from before to after the intervention. The results showed that participants who were randomized to a brief meditation intervention were no more likely to report a distressing experience than those who were randomized to use the internet as usual (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.76-1.47; P=.76). The results also showed that participants who were randomized to a brief meditation intervention were less likely to report clinically relevant increases in negative affect relative to using the internet as usual (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50-0.80; P<.001). Notably, participants in the 10-minute condition had a significantly higher likelihood of reporting a distressing experience than those in the 5-minute condition (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.89; P=.02). Preintervention characteristics showed acceptable discrimination ability to predict a distressing experience (area under the curve=0.73) and slightly lower ability to predict increased negative affect (area under the curve=0.67). Conclusions Taken together, we found that the brief, digitally delivered meditation practices tested in this study carry risks of adverse experiences that are comparable to or lower than those of typical activities on the internet; 10-minute condition was more likely to result in distressing experiences than 5-minute condition; and adverse responses to a brief meditation practice can, at least to a certain degree, be predicted using preintervention characteristics. Trial Registration Open Science Framework 94HKS; https://osf.io/94hks/overview
Authors
- Zishan Jiwani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9054-8982)
- Simon B. Goldberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6888-0126)
- Walter Osika (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1583-7319)
- Mini Ruiz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9910-8809)
- Jayanth Narayanan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2720-1593)
- Otto Simonsson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4197-7566)
- Matthew J. Hirshberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9070-1270)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JMIR Mental Health
- Published
- 2026-09-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2196/95628
- Primary Topic
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00