Lay perspectives on using “dark” and alternative labels to describe the Dark Tetrad.

= 753) evaluated dark alongside some popular alternative terms for characterizing the D4 traits. Although participants generally did not perceive dark as less accurate than alternatives (e.g., antagonistic, socially aversive), they did perceive dark as less scientific-sounding and less appropriate for professional use (clinical and research use). Furthermore, perceptions of dark varied across some moral and sociopolitical variables, suggesting that perceptions of the term are variable across people. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000785
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Lay perspectives on using “dark” and alternative labels to describe the Dark Tetrad.

Braden T. Hall, Peter J. Castagna, Sabrina Barella, William Hart
Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

Lay perspectives on using “dark” and alternative labels to describe the Dark Tetrad.

Braden T. Hall, Peter J. Castagna, Sabrina Barella, William Hart
article en

Abstract

= 753) evaluated dark alongside some popular alternative terms for characterizing the D4 traits. Although participants generally did not perceive dark as less accurate than alternatives (e.g., antagonistic, socially aversive), they did perceive dark as less scientific-sounding and less appropriate for professional use (clinical and research use). Furthermore, perceptions of dark varied across some moral and sociopolitical variables, suggesting that perceptions of the term are variable across people. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
University of Alabama (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.