From Complexity to Belonging: Edgar Morin and the Philosophy of Belonging on the Organization of Reality

This paper presents a systematic comparison between Edgar Morin’s complex thought and Carlos Federico Obregón Díaz’s Philosophy of Belonging. Both frameworks reject reductionism, linear causation, disciplinary fragmentation, and the conception of the individual as an isolated and self-sufficient entity. Their theoretical purposes, however, are different. Morin primarily develops an epistemological and methodological framework for understanding complex reality, whereas the Philosophy of Belonging proposes an ontology of organized existence. The article reconstructs Morin’s dialogical, recursive, and hologrammatic principles within the four fundamental principles of the Philosophy of Belonging: all existence is organized existence; reality is stratified into material, biological, and human-institutional levels; organization is simultaneously synchronic and diachronic; and every belonging is imperfect. The comparison shows that Morin’s principles have ontological counterparts within the Philosophy of Belonging. The dialogical principle appears in the inseparability of synchrony and diachrony and in the coexistence of belonging and autonomy; recursion appears in the mutual constitution of organizations and their components; and the hologrammatic principle appears in the reciprocal dependence of parts and wholes. The relationship between the two systems is consequently asymmetrical. The Philosophy of Belonging can explain why Morin’s epistemological principles are appropriate for understanding reality, but Morin’s principles do not independently entail the proposition “Being is Belonging,” the stratification of reality, dual temporality, or the necessary imperfection of belonging. The article concludes with a balanced assessment of the strengths and limitations of both projects and identifies the Philosophy of Belonging as a broader ontological architecture within which Morin’s complex thought can be preserved and reformulated.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22743619
Primary Topic
Critical Realism in Sociology
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

From Complexity to Belonging: Edgar Morin and the Philosophy of Belonging on the Organization of Reality

Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Critical Realism in Sociology
preprint

From Complexity to Belonging: Edgar Morin and the Philosophy of Belonging on the Organization of Reality

Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz
preprint en

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic comparison between Edgar Morin’s complex thought and Carlos Federico Obregón Díaz’s Philosophy of Belonging. Both frameworks reject reductionism, linear causation, disciplinary fragmentation, and the conception of the individual as an isolated and self-sufficient entity. Their theoretical purposes, however, are different. Morin primarily develops an epistemological and methodological framework for understanding complex reality, whereas the Philosophy of Belonging proposes an ontology of organized existence. The article reconstructs Morin’s dialogical, recursive, and hologrammatic principles within the four fundamental principles of the Philosophy of Belonging: all existence is organized existence; reality is stratified into material, biological, and human-institutional levels; organization is simultaneously synchronic and diachronic; and every belonging is imperfect. The comparison shows that Morin’s principles have ontological counterparts within the Philosophy of Belonging. The dialogical principle appears in the inseparability of synchrony and diachrony and in the coexistence of belonging and autonomy; recursion appears in the mutual constitution of organizations and their components; and the hologrammatic principle appears in the reciprocal dependence of parts and wholes. The relationship between the two systems is consequently asymmetrical. The Philosophy of Belonging can explain why Morin’s epistemological principles are appropriate for understanding reality, but Morin’s principles do not independently entail the proposition “Being is Belonging,” the stratification of reality, dual temporality, or the necessary imperfection of belonging. The article concludes with a balanced assessment of the strengths and limitations of both projects and identifies the Philosophy of Belonging as a broader ontological architecture within which Morin’s complex thought can be preserved and reformulated.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Critical Realism in Sociology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.