ORGANIC FOOD SYSTEMS AND POVERTY

{"This":[0],"article":[1,93],"examines":[2],"whether":[3,215],"organic":[4,39,64,149,216],"food":[5,33,65,83,217],"systems":[6,150],"reduce":[7,54],"poverty":[8,56],"or":[9,220],"instead":[10],"reproduce":[11],"it":[12,75],"through":[13,69],"new":[14],"forms":[15],"of":[16,79,124],"market":[17],"exclusion.":[18],"The":[19,128,145,191],"central":[20],"argument":[21],"is":[22,26,66,130,194,213,218],"that":[23,99,148,208],"the":[24,32,36,60,77,92,114,135,138,142,209],"relationship":[25],"conditional,":[27],"asymmetric,":[28],"and":[29,41,106,111,121,141,163,174,186,201],"position-dependent":[30],"within":[31],"system.":[34],"On":[35,59],"production":[37],"side,":[38,62],"farming":[40],"certification":[42,178],"can":[43,73,151,169,230],"raise":[44],"farm-gate":[45],"prices,":[46],"increase":[47],"household":[48],"income,":[49],"and,":[50],"under":[51,225],"some":[52],"conditions,":[53],"multidimensional":[55],"among":[57],"smallholders.":[58],"consumption":[61],"however,":[63],"usually":[67],"sold":[68],"premium":[70],"channels,":[71],"which":[72],"place":[74],"beyond":[76],"reach":[78],"poor":[80],"households":[81],"whose":[82],"choices":[84],"are":[85,189],"constrained":[86],"by":[87],"already-fragile":[88],"purchasing":[89],"power.":[90],"Methodologically,":[91],"adopts":[94],"a":[95],"structured":[96],"conceptual":[97],"review":[98],"integrates":[100],"recent":[101],"peer-reviewed":[102],"studies":[103],"with":[104],"policy":[105,211],"statistical":[107],"evidence":[108,146],"from":[109],"Food":[110],"Agriculture":[112,126],"Organization[1],":[113],"World":[115],"Bank[2],":[116],"IFOAM":[117],"-":[118],"Organics":[119],"International[3],":[120],"Research":[122],"Institute":[123],"Organic":[125],"FiBL[4].":[127],"synthesis":[129],"organized":[131,155],"around":[132],"three":[133],"mechanisms:":[134],"income":[136],"channel,":[137,140],"price":[139],"access":[143,164],"channel.":[144],"suggests":[147],"be":[152,170,231],"pro-poor":[153],"for":[154,172,222],"producers":[156,176],"who":[157],"capture":[158],"premiums,":[159],"obtain":[160],"extension":[161],"support,":[162],"reliable":[165],"markets,":[166],"but":[167,224],"they":[168],"exclusionary":[171],"consumers":[173],"marginal":[175],"when":[177],"costs,":[179],"labor":[180],"requirements,":[181],"lower":[182],"yields":[183],"during":[184],"transition,":[185],"retail":[187],"markups":[188],"high.":[190],"article's":[192],"contribution":[193],"to":[195],"connect":[196],"producer":[197],"welfare,":[198],"consumer":[199],"affordability,":[200],"agrifood-system":[202],"governance":[203],"in":[204],"one":[205],"framework,":[206],"showing":[207],"key":[210],"question":[212],"not":[214],"\\"good\\"":[219],"\\"bad\\"":[221],"poverty,":[223],"what":[226],"institutional":[227],"conditions":[228],"sustainability":[229],"made":[232],"socially":[233],"inclusive.":[234],"[5]":[235]}