Delivering prehabilitation in cancer surgery: a service evaluation at Nottingham University Hospitals

Abstract Purpose To evaluate outcomes of a multimodal prehabilitation service for cancer surgery patients delivered through three pathways (Specialised, Targeted, Universal) within routine NHS care at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Methods This was a retrospective observational service evaluation of routine care data collected between 2022 and 2025. Of 1961 referred patients, 1720 were analysed: Specialised ( n = 329), Targeted ( n = 943), and Universal ( n = 448). Multimodal prehabilitation included exercise, nutrition, and psychological support, stratified by risk. Functional capacity was assessed using the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT), 60-s Sit-to-Stand (STS), and grip strength. Psychological well-being was measured using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Physical activity behaviour was also recorded. Results All pathways showed significant within-group improvements. ISWT increased by 57 m ( p < 0.001, d = 0.6) and STS by 6 repetitions ( p < 0.001, d = 0.9). Anxiety (Δ –1.9) and depression (Δ –2.0) scores decreased (both p < 0.001, d ≈ –0.5). Weekly physical activity rose by 142 min ( d = 1.07), and strength sessions increased by 2.4 per week ( d = 1.1). Between-group differences were limited: PHQ-9 improved more in Specialised versus Targeted, and strength sessions increased more in Universal versus Targeted. Conclusion A tiered, multimodal prehabilitation service integrated into cancer pathways produced meaningful functional, psychological, and behavioural benefits, supporting broader implementation and improved patient access.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11113-y
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Delivering prehabilitation in cancer surgery: a service evaluation at Nottingham University Hospitals

Dominic O’Connor, Ayleen Haywood, Abdulrahman Alharbi
Supportive Care in Cancer
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Delivering prehabilitation in cancer surgery: a service evaluation at Nottingham University Hospitals

Dominic O’Connor, Ayleen Haywood, Abdulrahman Alharbi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To evaluate outcomes of a multimodal prehabilitation service for cancer surgery patients delivered through three pathways (Specialised, Targeted, Universal) within routine NHS care at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Methods This was a retrospective observational service evaluation of routine care data collected between 2022 and 2025. Of 1961 referred patients, 1720 were analysed: Specialised ( n = 329), Targeted ( n = 943), and Universal ( n = 448). Multimodal prehabilitation included exercise, nutrition, and psychological support, stratified by risk. Functional capacity was assessed using the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT), 60-s Sit-to-Stand (STS), and grip strength. Psychological well-being was measured using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Physical activity behaviour was also recorded. Results All pathways showed significant within-group improvements. ISWT increased by 57 m ( p < 0.001, d = 0.6) and STS by 6 repetitions ( p < 0.001, d = 0.9). Anxiety (Δ –1.9) and depression (Δ –2.0) scores decreased (both p < 0.001, d ≈ –0.5). Weekly physical activity rose by 142 min ( d = 1.07), and strength sessions increased by 2.4 per week ( d = 1.1). Between-group differences were limited: PHQ-9 improved more in Specialised versus Targeted, and strength sessions increased more in Universal versus Targeted. Conclusion A tiered, multimodal prehabilitation service integrated into cancer pathways produced meaningful functional, psychological, and behavioural benefits, supporting broader implementation and improved patient access.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(10)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.