Gastric electrical stimulation for children with refractory nausea and vomiting: A sham‐controlled trial

Abstract Objectives Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) improves symptoms in children with refractory nausea and vomiting, but pediatric evidence is limited to observational studies. We conducted the first controlled trial of GES in children. Methods We performed a single‐blind, sham‐controlled trial of temporary GES in children using a nasogastric lead. After endoscopic lead placement on study day 1, the stimulator was OFF for 4 days and then ON for 4 days. Participants were blinded to stimulation status. Symptom Monitor Worksheet (SMW) scores and nutrient drink test volumes were collected at baseline (day 1), end of the OFF phase (study day 5), and end of the ON phase (study day 9). Results Thirty children (83% female, median age 16 years) were included. All carried a clinical diagnosis of gastroparesis, although only 53% had delayed gastric emptying on scintigraphy; 40% also had functional dyspepsia. Average SMW scores improved from baseline during the OFF phase ( β = −0.59, p < 0.001) and improved further when the stimulator was ON ( β = −0.42, p = 0.005). Both symptom frequency and severity improved over time. Exploratory analyses showed reductions in postprandial fullness, nausea, and vomiting scores during active stimulation. Maximum tolerated volume during the nutrient drink test increased significantly only when the stimulator was ON ( β = 38.9 mL, p = 0.01). After the trial, 25 of 30 participants (83%) proceeded with permanent GES implantation. Conclusions In this sham‐controlled trial, children with refractory nausea and vomiting demonstrated significant symptom improvement. When the stimulator was ON, nausea showed a numerically greater reduction, vomiting continued to improve and nutrient intake increased significantly. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07474415 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07474415 ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70583
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Gastric electrical stimulation for children with refractory nausea and vomiting: A sham‐controlled trial

Ashley Kroon Van Diest, Raul E. Sanchez, Carlo Di Lorenzo, Eduardo Castillo‐Leon et al.
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

Gastric electrical stimulation for children with refractory nausea and vomiting: A sham‐controlled trial

Ashley Kroon Van Diest, Raul E. Sanchez, Carlo Di Lorenzo, Eduardo Castillo‐Leon, Amina P. Usman, Neetu B. Puri, Desale Yacob, Karla Vaz, Peter L. Lu, Kathryn Hawa, Karen Diefenbach
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) improves symptoms in children with refractory nausea and vomiting, but pediatric evidence is limited to observational studies. We conducted the first controlled trial of GES in children. Methods We performed a single‐blind, sham‐controlled trial of temporary GES in children using a nasogastric lead. After endoscopic lead placement on study day 1, the stimulator was OFF for 4 days and then ON for 4 days. Participants were blinded to stimulation status. Symptom Monitor Worksheet (SMW) scores and nutrient drink test volumes were collected at baseline (day 1), end of the OFF phase (study day 5), and end of the ON phase (study day 9). Results Thirty children (83% female, median age 16 years) were included. All carried a clinical diagnosis of gastroparesis, although only 53% had delayed gastric emptying on scintigraphy; 40% also had functional dyspepsia. Average SMW scores improved from baseline during the OFF phase ( β = −0.59, p < 0.001) and improved further when the stimulator was ON ( β = −0.42, p = 0.005). Both symptom frequency and severity improved over time. Exploratory analyses showed reductions in postprandial fullness, nausea, and vomiting scores during active stimulation. Maximum tolerated volume during the nutrient drink test increased significantly only when the stimulator was ON ( β = 38.9 mL, p = 0.01). After the trial, 25 of 30 participants (83%) proceeded with permanent GES implantation. Conclusions In this sham‐controlled trial, children with refractory nausea and vomiting demonstrated significant symptom improvement. When the stimulator was ON, nausea showed a numerically greater reduction, vomiting continued to improve and nutrient intake increased significantly. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07474415 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07474415 ).

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), Riley Hospital for Children (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.