Low-flow time and neurological outcomes in AMI patients undergoing ECPR: a retrospective cohort study

Background Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by refractory cardiac arrest (CA) carries extremely high mortality and neurological disability rates. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a rescue intervention for this population, but outcomes after its use vary widely across individuals. Low-flow time (the interval from initiation of chest compressions to establishment of stable ECMO flow) is an important prognostic factor among ECPR-treated patients. Its association with outcomes in Chinese patients with AMI-related CA remains incompletely characterized. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 161 eligible adult patients with AMI-related refractory CA who received ECPR at our tertiary center between January 2019 and December 2025. The primary endpoint was 30-day unfavorable neurological outcome [Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score 3-5]. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated low-flow time continuously as the primary exposure. RCS regression assessed possible nonlinearity, whereas ROC analysis provided a secondary, exploratory cohort-specific classification. We performed an exact-timing sensitivity analysis and a full-cohort interaction analysis to assess heterogeneity by arrest setting. Results Among the 161 enrolled patients, 118 (73.3%) had 30-day unfavorable neurological outcomes, including 104 deaths (64.6%). After multivariable adjustment, each additional minute of low-flow time was associated with higher odds of unfavorable outcome (aOR 1.065, 95% CI 1.036–1.096; P < 0.001). The association remained in 132 patients with exact timing (aOR 1.082, 95% CI 1.042–1.124; P < 0.001). In a parsimoniously adjusted interaction model, the estimated aOR per minute was 1.061 (95% CI 1.027–1.096) for IHCA and 1.072 (95% CI 1.023–1.124) for OHCA; the interaction was not statistically detectable ( P = 0.708). RCS did not detect nonlinearity ( P = 0.660). The exploratory 50.9-min classification was internally derived and its bootstrap cutpoints were widely distributed. Conclusions Among selected AMI patients who received ECPR, increasing low-flow time was progressively associated with unfavorable 30-day neurological outcome, with no detected nonlinear inflection or evidence of effect modification by arrest setting. These findings are prognostic among ECPR-treated patients and do not define when ECPR should or should not be initiated. The internally derived 50.9-min classification is exploratory and is not an eligibility threshold.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1942551
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Low-flow time and neurological outcomes in AMI patients undergoing ECPR: a retrospective cohort study

Lijun Xu, Qian Yu, Yanwei Cheng, Bingwei Liang
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Low-flow time and neurological outcomes in AMI patients undergoing ECPR: a retrospective cohort study

Lijun Xu, Qian Yu, Yanwei Cheng, Bingwei Liang
article en

Abstract

Background Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by refractory cardiac arrest (CA) carries extremely high mortality and neurological disability rates. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a rescue intervention for this population, but outcomes after its use vary widely across individuals. Low-flow time (the interval from initiation of chest compressions to establishment of stable ECMO flow) is an important prognostic factor among ECPR-treated patients. Its association with outcomes in Chinese patients with AMI-related CA remains incompletely characterized. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 161 eligible adult patients with AMI-related refractory CA who received ECPR at our tertiary center between January 2019 and December 2025. The primary endpoint was 30-day unfavorable neurological outcome [Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score 3-5]. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated low-flow time continuously as the primary exposure. RCS regression assessed possible nonlinearity, whereas ROC analysis provided a secondary, exploratory cohort-specific classification. We performed an exact-timing sensitivity analysis and a full-cohort interaction analysis to assess heterogeneity by arrest setting. Results Among the 161 enrolled patients, 118 (73.3%) had 30-day unfavorable neurological outcomes, including 104 deaths (64.6%). After multivariable adjustment, each additional minute of low-flow time was associated with higher odds of unfavorable outcome (aOR 1.065, 95% CI 1.036–1.096; P < 0.001). The association remained in 132 patients with exact timing (aOR 1.082, 95% CI 1.042–1.124; P < 0.001). In a parsimoniously adjusted interaction model, the estimated aOR per minute was 1.061 (95% CI 1.027–1.096) for IHCA and 1.072 (95% CI 1.023–1.124) for OHCA; the interaction was not statistically detectable ( P = 0.708). RCS did not detect nonlinearity ( P = 0.660). The exploratory 50.9-min classification was internally derived and its bootstrap cutpoints were widely distributed. Conclusions Among selected AMI patients who received ECPR, increasing low-flow time was progressively associated with unfavorable 30-day neurological outcome, with no detected nonlinear inflection or evidence of effect modification by arrest setting. These findings are prognostic among ECPR-treated patients and do not define when ECPR should or should not be initiated. The internally derived 50.9-min classification is exploratory and is not an eligibility threshold.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 13
Henan Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.