Who counts as a worker: the Mississippi Freedom Labor Union in the Delta, 1965 to 1966

The Mississippi Freedom Labor Union (MFLU) organized agricultural and domestic workers, unemployed people, and evicted sharecroppers in the Mississippi Delta during 1965–1966. Drawing on union documents, oral histories, movement correspondence, and government records, this article argues that its efforts to maintain a constituency across employment and unemployment connected wage demands to struggles over food, housing, and public employment. Agricultural mechanization reduced strike leverage, while employer retaliation, resource shortages, and internal disputes weakened collective action. Exclusion from federal collective bargaining protections and uneven support from established unions further limited the MFLU’s ability to sustain its members. Strike City and the related campaigns for public assistance reveal both the possibilities and the difficulties of representing people whose claims as workers persisted after the loss of their jobs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Labor History
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0023656x.2026.2734509
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who counts as a worker: the Mississippi Freedom Labor Union in the Delta, 1965 to 1966

Yuan Huang
Labor History
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Who counts as a worker: the Mississippi Freedom Labor Union in the Delta, 1965 to 1966

Yuan Huang
article en

Abstract

The Mississippi Freedom Labor Union (MFLU) organized agricultural and domestic workers, unemployed people, and evicted sharecroppers in the Mississippi Delta during 1965–1966. Drawing on union documents, oral histories, movement correspondence, and government records, this article argues that its efforts to maintain a constituency across employment and unemployment connected wage demands to struggles over food, housing, and public employment. Agricultural mechanization reduced strike leverage, while employer retaliation, resource shortages, and internal disputes weakened collective action. Exclusion from federal collective bargaining protections and uneven support from established unions further limited the MFLU’s ability to sustain its members. Strike City and the related campaigns for public assistance reveal both the possibilities and the difficulties of representing people whose claims as workers persisted after the loss of their jobs.

Labor History
Sichuan International Studies University (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.