Body Mass Index and LDL Cholesterol Across Controls, Hypertension, and Ischemic Heart Disease with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Single-Center Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Background/Objectives: We compared BMI and LDL-C across database-defined reference controls, hypertension, and preserved-EF ischemic heart disease without assuming HFpEF. Methods: This single-center retrospective cross-sectional study included 128 adults (20 controls, 46 with hypertension, and 62 in the preserved-EF ischemic group). Analyses included nonparametric tests, multinomial regression, clinical-group models with and without statin adjustment, and a post hoc common-age sensitivity analysis. Results: Median BMI was 25.89, 28.25, and 29.00 kg/m2, respectively (p < 0.001); median LDL-C was 86.0, 109.5, and 100.0 mg/dL (p = 0.055), alongside statin use of 0%, 50.0%, and 87.1%. Per 5 kg/m2 higher BMI, the adjusted RRR for preserved-EF ischemic versus control status was 3.94 (95% CI 1.60–9.71; p = 0.003) and remained 3.48 (95% CI 1.35–8.97; p = 0.010) among participants aged 40–68 years. In clinical-group models, BMI estimates were similar without and with statin adjustment (OR 1.76 and 1.89); LDL-C was not independently associated with preserved-EF ischemic status. Conclusions: BMI differed more consistently across groups than treated, contemporaneous LDL-C. These associations are imprecise and describe group status; they do not establish causation, progression, prospective HF risk, or HFpEF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15187096
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Body Mass Index and LDL Cholesterol Across Controls, Hypertension, and Ischemic Heart Disease with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Single-Center Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Ana-Maria Pah, Simona Ruxanda Dragan, Gabriela Otiman, Gheorghe Stoichescu-Hogea et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Body Mass Index and LDL Cholesterol Across Controls, Hypertension, and Ischemic Heart Disease with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Single-Center Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Ana-Maria Pah, Simona Ruxanda Dragan, Gabriela Otiman, Gheorghe Stoichescu-Hogea, Maria Rada, Adina Avram, Maria-Laura Craciun, Cristina Ples, Abdeldayem Mahmoud, Cornel Jupaneant
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: We compared BMI and LDL-C across database-defined reference controls, hypertension, and preserved-EF ischemic heart disease without assuming HFpEF. Methods: This single-center retrospective cross-sectional study included 128 adults (20 controls, 46 with hypertension, and 62 in the preserved-EF ischemic group). Analyses included nonparametric tests, multinomial regression, clinical-group models with and without statin adjustment, and a post hoc common-age sensitivity analysis. Results: Median BMI was 25.89, 28.25, and 29.00 kg/m2, respectively (p < 0.001); median LDL-C was 86.0, 109.5, and 100.0 mg/dL (p = 0.055), alongside statin use of 0%, 50.0%, and 87.1%. Per 5 kg/m2 higher BMI, the adjusted RRR for preserved-EF ischemic versus control status was 3.94 (95% CI 1.60–9.71; p = 0.003) and remained 3.48 (95% CI 1.35–8.97; p = 0.010) among participants aged 40–68 years. In clinical-group models, BMI estimates were similar without and with statin adjustment (OR 1.76 and 1.89); LDL-C was not independently associated with preserved-EF ischemic status. Conclusions: BMI differed more consistently across groups than treated, contemporaneous LDL-C. These associations are imprecise and describe group status; they do not establish causation, progression, prospective HF risk, or HFpEF.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(18)
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.