GOVERNANCE, CONFLICT, AND THE PROSPECTS FOR SUSTAINABLE PEACE IN AFRICA: A SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL DRIVERS AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT MODELS

Purpose of study: This study examines the relationship between governance failure, conflict, and prospects for sustainable peace in Africa. It analyses how institutional weakness, political exclusion, neopatrimonialism, social exclusion, and security-sector failures contribute to conflict, while assessing mediation, negotiation, and transitional justice through a social transformation perspective. Methodology: The study adopts a qualitative, conceptual and documentary research approach. It synthesises governance and peacebuilding literature alongside evidence from selected African cases, including the Central African Republic, Sahel, Ethiopia, Kenya, Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, Sudan, and South Sudan. The analysis evaluates conflict-management models using social transformation criteria. Findings: The analysis establishes that African conflicts are not inevitable consequences of poverty, ethnic diversity, resource scarcity, or cultural differences, but are significantly shaped by governance choices and institutional failures. Five interconnected dimensions emerge: institutional weakness and state fragility, political exclusion and electoral manipulation, neopatrimonial and predatory governance, ethnic and social exclusion, and security sector abuse. These failures intensify grievances, weaken legitimacy, and create conditions for violent mobilisation. Mediation and negotiation can effectively halt violence and create political space but may encourage elite capture when participation is narrow. Transitional justice promotes accountability, truth, dignity, and reconciliation but may inadequately address structural inequalities when focused primarily on individual perpetrators. Conclusion: Sustainable peace in Africa is fundamentally a governance and social transformation project. Mediation, negotiation, and transitional justice are most effective when embedded within broader reforms addressing exclusion, inequality, institutional weakness, accountability, and social relations. Strengthening inclusive and capable institutions, supported by African regional peace architectures, offers a more durable pathway from conflict management to positive peace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peace Human Rights Governance
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22743253
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

GOVERNANCE, CONFLICT, AND THE PROSPECTS FOR SUSTAINABLE PEACE IN AFRICA: A SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL DRIVERS AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT MODELS

Samuel Alfayo Nyanchoga, Kerry Muhati
Peace Human Rights Governance
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

GOVERNANCE, CONFLICT, AND THE PROSPECTS FOR SUSTAINABLE PEACE IN AFRICA: A SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL DRIVERS AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT MODELS

Samuel Alfayo Nyanchoga, Kerry Muhati
article en

Abstract

Purpose of study: This study examines the relationship between governance failure, conflict, and prospects for sustainable peace in Africa. It analyses how institutional weakness, political exclusion, neopatrimonialism, social exclusion, and security-sector failures contribute to conflict, while assessing mediation, negotiation, and transitional justice through a social transformation perspective. Methodology: The study adopts a qualitative, conceptual and documentary research approach. It synthesises governance and peacebuilding literature alongside evidence from selected African cases, including the Central African Republic, Sahel, Ethiopia, Kenya, Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, Sudan, and South Sudan. The analysis evaluates conflict-management models using social transformation criteria. Findings: The analysis establishes that African conflicts are not inevitable consequences of poverty, ethnic diversity, resource scarcity, or cultural differences, but are significantly shaped by governance choices and institutional failures. Five interconnected dimensions emerge: institutional weakness and state fragility, political exclusion and electoral manipulation, neopatrimonial and predatory governance, ethnic and social exclusion, and security sector abuse. These failures intensify grievances, weaken legitimacy, and create conditions for violent mobilisation. Mediation and negotiation can effectively halt violence and create political space but may encourage elite capture when participation is narrow. Transitional justice promotes accountability, truth, dignity, and reconciliation but may inadequately address structural inequalities when focused primarily on individual perpetrators. Conclusion: Sustainable peace in Africa is fundamentally a governance and social transformation project. Mediation, negotiation, and transitional justice are most effective when embedded within broader reforms addressing exclusion, inequality, institutional weakness, accountability, and social relations. Strengthening inclusive and capable institutions, supported by African regional peace architectures, offers a more durable pathway from conflict management to positive peace.

Peace Human Rights Governance
University of Nairobi (KE), African Institute for Development Policy (KE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.