Beyond ESG Ratings: Informational Value of Specific ESG Factors for Corporate Carbon Management

As ESG disclosure and climate governance requirements become increasingly institutionalized, understanding how firms respond to external sustainability pressures through specific governance mechanisms and how these responses relate to carbon performance has become an important research issue. Moving beyond aggregate ESG ratings, this study examines the informational value of specific ESG-related factors for corporate carbon management, including energy management systems, innovation capability, human capital, market valuation, and board governance. Using data on Taiwanese listed and over-the-counter companies from the ESG database of the Financial Supervisory Commission, the Taiwan Economic Journal, and the Leadership ISO Survey, this study employs a time-lagged design linking 2023 firm characteristics to 2024 carbon emission intensity. Multiple regression analysis is the primary method, with firm size, leverage, capital intensity, profitability, and firm age included as firm-level controls in extended models; exploratory data analysis (EDA) serves as a supplementary diagnostic for data distribution, nonlinearity, and variable operationalization. Cross-year, alternative dependent-variable, and supplementary analyses are used to assess the stability of the estimates. The results show that ISO 50001 certification is positively associated with subsequent carbon emission intensity, whereas the structural characteristics of R&D investment and independent director governance show more stable negative associations. Average salary, female director representation, and Tobin’s Q yield inconsistent results. Proportion-based board measures outperform director-count and threshold-based measures, but no clear critical-mass threshold is supported. Results also vary under alternative carbon-performance measures, suggesting that carbon intensity and absolute emissions capture different dimensions of environmental performance. These findings indicate conditional statistical associations rather than causal effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19090725
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Beyond ESG Ratings: Informational Value of Specific ESG Factors for Corporate Carbon Management

San‐Pui Lam, Sheng-Yuan Wang
Journal of risk and financial management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Beyond ESG Ratings: Informational Value of Specific ESG Factors for Corporate Carbon Management

San‐Pui Lam, Sheng-Yuan Wang
article en

Abstract

As ESG disclosure and climate governance requirements become increasingly institutionalized, understanding how firms respond to external sustainability pressures through specific governance mechanisms and how these responses relate to carbon performance has become an important research issue. Moving beyond aggregate ESG ratings, this study examines the informational value of specific ESG-related factors for corporate carbon management, including energy management systems, innovation capability, human capital, market valuation, and board governance. Using data on Taiwanese listed and over-the-counter companies from the ESG database of the Financial Supervisory Commission, the Taiwan Economic Journal, and the Leadership ISO Survey, this study employs a time-lagged design linking 2023 firm characteristics to 2024 carbon emission intensity. Multiple regression analysis is the primary method, with firm size, leverage, capital intensity, profitability, and firm age included as firm-level controls in extended models; exploratory data analysis (EDA) serves as a supplementary diagnostic for data distribution, nonlinearity, and variable operationalization. Cross-year, alternative dependent-variable, and supplementary analyses are used to assess the stability of the estimates. The results show that ISO 50001 certification is positively associated with subsequent carbon emission intensity, whereas the structural characteristics of R&D investment and independent director governance show more stable negative associations. Average salary, female director representation, and Tobin’s Q yield inconsistent results. Proportion-based board measures outperform director-count and threshold-based measures, but no clear critical-mass threshold is supported. Results also vary under alternative carbon-performance measures, suggesting that carbon intensity and absolute emissions capture different dimensions of environmental performance. These findings indicate conditional statistical associations rather than causal effects.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 19(9)
National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond ESG Ratings: Informational Value of Specific ESG Factors for Corporate Carbon Management — San‐Pui Lam, Sheng-Yuan Wang · Journal of risk and financial management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS