The FIT–FRAIL–DISABLE Framework: A Multidimensional CGA-Based Model for Proportional Treatment of Older Adults Across Speciality Care

Frailty, cognitive impairment, depression, functional dependency, low physical performance, and undernutrition are highly prevalent in older adults referred for cancer treatment, cardiovascular interventions, neurological therapies, and orthopaedic surgery, and each independently predicts treatment toxicity, post-procedural complications, and mortality. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is the most accurate predictor of treatment outcomes in older patients, yet it remains structurally absent from most speciality pathways, contributing to overtreatment of biologically frail patients and undertreatment of biologically robust ones. In this Viewpoint, we propose and operationalise the FIT–FRAIL–DISABLE multidimensional geriatric stratification model as a conceptual framework for translating CGA findings into proportional, speciality-specific treatment recommendations across oncology, cardiology, neurogeriatrics, and orthogeriatrics. The model integrates six validated CGA instruments—the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), basic and instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL, IADL), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF)—into three actionable categories (FIT, FRAIL, DISABLE) aligned with full-intensity, risk-adapted, and symptom-focused care, and is explicitly positioned in relation to the deficit-based frailty paradigm and the WHO Intrinsic Capacity (ICOPE) framework, which it complements rather than replaces. We specify a provisional, a priori decision rule for combining domain scores and describe how each stratification category should inform—but not dictate—goal-concordant treatment intensity within a shared decision-making process. FIT–FRAIL–DISABLE is presented as a proposed, hypothesis-generating framework: its composite thresholds and domain weighting have not yet been empirically derived, and the model has not undergone prospective validation. Retrospective calibration on existing CGA cohorts and prospective multicentre validation are being designed within the GERIA-NET research consortium. If validated, the framework has the potential to reduce both overtreatment-related harm and undertreatment-related therapeutic deprivation in older adults undergoing active treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23091213
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The FIT–FRAIL–DISABLE Framework: A Multidimensional CGA-Based Model for Proportional Treatment of Older Adults Across Speciality Care

Francesco Palmese, Marcello Maggio, Crescenzo Testa, Grazia Daniela Femminella et al.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Frailty in Older Adults
article

The FIT–FRAIL–DISABLE Framework: A Multidimensional CGA-Based Model for Proportional Treatment of Older Adults Across Speciality Care

Francesco Palmese, Marcello Maggio, Crescenzo Testa, Grazia Daniela Femminella, Fulvio Lauretani, Marco Domenicali
article en

Abstract

Frailty, cognitive impairment, depression, functional dependency, low physical performance, and undernutrition are highly prevalent in older adults referred for cancer treatment, cardiovascular interventions, neurological therapies, and orthopaedic surgery, and each independently predicts treatment toxicity, post-procedural complications, and mortality. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is the most accurate predictor of treatment outcomes in older patients, yet it remains structurally absent from most speciality pathways, contributing to overtreatment of biologically frail patients and undertreatment of biologically robust ones. In this Viewpoint, we propose and operationalise the FIT–FRAIL–DISABLE multidimensional geriatric stratification model as a conceptual framework for translating CGA findings into proportional, speciality-specific treatment recommendations across oncology, cardiology, neurogeriatrics, and orthogeriatrics. The model integrates six validated CGA instruments—the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), basic and instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL, IADL), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF)—into three actionable categories (FIT, FRAIL, DISABLE) aligned with full-intensity, risk-adapted, and symptom-focused care, and is explicitly positioned in relation to the deficit-based frailty paradigm and the WHO Intrinsic Capacity (ICOPE) framework, which it complements rather than replaces. We specify a provisional, a priori decision rule for combining domain scores and describe how each stratification category should inform—but not dictate—goal-concordant treatment intensity within a shared decision-making process. FIT–FRAIL–DISABLE is presented as a proposed, hypothesis-generating framework: its composite thresholds and domain weighting have not yet been empirically derived, and the model has not undergone prospective validation. Retrospective calibration on existing CGA cohorts and prospective multicentre validation are being designed within the GERIA-NET research consortium. If validated, the framework has the potential to reduce both overtreatment-related harm and undertreatment-related therapeutic deprivation in older adults undergoing active treatment.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 23(9)
University of Parma (IT), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna (IT), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna (IT), Federico II University Hospital (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.