Proximity, network centrality, and university–industry collaboration: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China

Existing proximity research has increasingly recognized the dynamic relationship between proximities and innovation networks, yet less is known about how network centrality conditions proximity effects in intercity university–industry (UI) collaboration. This paper develops a multidimensional proximity framework that incorporates cities’ network positions and actor heterogeneity to examine the formation of intercity UI collaboration. Using PPML-HDFE and UI co-patent data for Chinese cities from 2006 to 2020, we focus on the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) and compare collaboration within the region with linkages between the YRD and the rest of China. The results show that cognitive proximity is the strongest non-spatial driver of intercity UI collaboration, highlighting the importance of absorptive capacity and technological relatedness. However, excessive cognitive similarity may generate redundancy and lock-in. This proximity paradox is not consistently moderated by aggregate network centrality; rather, decomposing centrality by actor type reveals that university-based centrality provides a more stable buffering effect than industry-based centrality. Universities, therefore, act as key gatekeepers that help cities access, translate and recombine external knowledge. The findings also show that geographical distance remains more robust than temporal proximity, suggesting that HSR connectivity is non-random. Organizational proximity, such as university branches and off-site research institutes, promotes collaboration but remains constrained by spatial frictions. Overall, the study demonstrates that proximity mechanisms are not fixed, but vary across actor types and spatial scales, and are conditioned by the structural positions cities occupy in collaboration networks. Policy interventions should therefore strengthen university-centred cross-regional linkages while avoiding excessive concentration of innovation resources in core cities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Geography
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2026.104179
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Proximity, network centrality, and university–industry collaboration: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China

Lin Xiao, Yang Fan, Wei Xu
Applied Geography
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

Proximity, network centrality, and university–industry collaboration: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China

Lin Xiao, Yang Fan, Wei Xu
article en

Abstract

Existing proximity research has increasingly recognized the dynamic relationship between proximities and innovation networks, yet less is known about how network centrality conditions proximity effects in intercity university–industry (UI) collaboration. This paper develops a multidimensional proximity framework that incorporates cities’ network positions and actor heterogeneity to examine the formation of intercity UI collaboration. Using PPML-HDFE and UI co-patent data for Chinese cities from 2006 to 2020, we focus on the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) and compare collaboration within the region with linkages between the YRD and the rest of China. The results show that cognitive proximity is the strongest non-spatial driver of intercity UI collaboration, highlighting the importance of absorptive capacity and technological relatedness. However, excessive cognitive similarity may generate redundancy and lock-in. This proximity paradox is not consistently moderated by aggregate network centrality; rather, decomposing centrality by actor type reveals that university-based centrality provides a more stable buffering effect than industry-based centrality. Universities, therefore, act as key gatekeepers that help cities access, translate and recombine external knowledge. The findings also show that geographical distance remains more robust than temporal proximity, suggesting that HSR connectivity is non-random. Organizational proximity, such as university branches and off-site research institutes, promotes collaboration but remains constrained by spatial frictions. Overall, the study demonstrates that proximity mechanisms are not fixed, but vary across actor types and spatial scales, and are conditioned by the structural positions cities occupy in collaboration networks. Policy interventions should therefore strengthen university-centred cross-regional linkages while avoiding excessive concentration of innovation resources in core cities.

Applied GeographyVol. 196
University of Lethbridge (CA), Shanghai International Studies University (CN), Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences (CN), Shanghai University of International Business and Economics (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.