Artificial Intelligence Needs an International Agency – Now

Artificial intelligence is advancing faster than the international institutions responsible for addressing its cross-border risks. Its benefits are substantial, but increasingly capable systems also create externalities, information asymmetries and competitive pressures that no individual company or national authority can address alone. The mechanisms established by the United Nations in 2025 provide scientific assessment and international dialogue, but they lack a mandate for mandatory declarations, independent evaluation, compliance verification, incident investigation and coordinated response. Recent incidents and public statements by researchers and industry leaders sharpen the urgency of this institutional gap, but the case for action does not depend on any single event, estimate or forecast. This article therefore recommends that the United Nations General Assembly formally open a pathway toward an International Artificial Intelligence Agency. Governed by its own statute, the agency would have a dual mandate for promotion and verification, with enhanced scrutiny limited to frontier AI activities exceeding internationally agreed thresholds for risk, autonomy, reach or cross-border impact. Its functions would include technical cooperation, capacity-building, declarations, international standards, accreditation of independent evaluators, incident reporting and investigation, verification of agreed controls and formal findings of non-compliance. The agency would conduct independent technical fact-finding, while political consequences would remain with States and the competent United Nations bodies. The proposal does not assume that AI can be verified in the same manner as nuclear material or that any evaluation can certify absolute safety. Verification would instead combine proportionate methods to assess compliance with agreed obligations and create an independent factual record, while protecting confidential and proprietary information. The immediate request is not to approve a final verification methodology or create a fully operational agency overnight. It is to authorize an institutional process that can begin testing methods, building international capacity and preparing a negotiated framework before a major crisis forces an improvised response.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22740393
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Artificial Intelligence Needs an International Agency – Now

Rogerio Piovesan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence Needs an International Agency – Now

Rogerio Piovesan
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is advancing faster than the international institutions responsible for addressing its cross-border risks. Its benefits are substantial, but increasingly capable systems also create externalities, information asymmetries and competitive pressures that no individual company or national authority can address alone. The mechanisms established by the United Nations in 2025 provide scientific assessment and international dialogue, but they lack a mandate for mandatory declarations, independent evaluation, compliance verification, incident investigation and coordinated response. Recent incidents and public statements by researchers and industry leaders sharpen the urgency of this institutional gap, but the case for action does not depend on any single event, estimate or forecast. This article therefore recommends that the United Nations General Assembly formally open a pathway toward an International Artificial Intelligence Agency. Governed by its own statute, the agency would have a dual mandate for promotion and verification, with enhanced scrutiny limited to frontier AI activities exceeding internationally agreed thresholds for risk, autonomy, reach or cross-border impact. Its functions would include technical cooperation, capacity-building, declarations, international standards, accreditation of independent evaluators, incident reporting and investigation, verification of agreed controls and formal findings of non-compliance. The agency would conduct independent technical fact-finding, while political consequences would remain with States and the competent United Nations bodies. The proposal does not assume that AI can be verified in the same manner as nuclear material or that any evaluation can certify absolute safety. Verification would instead combine proportionate methods to assess compliance with agreed obligations and create an independent factual record, while protecting confidential and proprietary information. The immediate request is not to approve a final verification methodology or create a fully operational agency overnight. It is to authorize an institutional process that can begin testing methods, building international capacity and preparing a negotiated framework before a major crisis forces an improvised response.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence Needs an International Agency – Now — Rogerio Piovesan · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS