Public Perceptions of Multiple Long‐Term Conditions: An Analysis of Mass Observation Accounts

INTRODUCTION: The growing number of people living with two or more long-term conditions presents challenges to medicine and society. While the terminology of 'multiple long-term conditions' (MLTC) or 'multimorbidity' has increasingly been adopted in research, policy and clinical practice, how the public responds to 'MLTC' remains underexplored. Given the important implications for research inclusion and intervention uptake, we aimed to address this gap by investigating public perceptions of MLTC. METHODS: Mass Observation Project respondents were invited to share their views on MLTC. We collated the five words that respondents were asked to provide when hearing the term 'multiple long-term health conditions' and compared the responses of people with and without MLTC. We then reviewed each full written account and identified categories describing the different ways in which the respondents referred to MLTC. RESULTS: Of 141 valid responses, 76 (53.9%) were written by people living with MLTC, two thirds of whom (67.1%) were aged 60 or over. Regardless of MLTC status, respondents predominantly associated MLTC with challenging embodied experiences such as pain and debilitation. We identified four types of response to 'MLTC': adopting, overlooking, resisting and rejecting. Around half the respondents (51.8%) adopted the construct, with 11.3% resisting or rejecting it due to concerns about its utility, incongruence with personal experience, or medicalisation of human experiences of illness. CONCLUSION: MLTC were predominantly associated with challenging embodied experiences, and the construct was not adopted by all respondents. Researchers, clinicians and policymakers should carefully consider how to describe the construct of MLTC in public-facing materials to optimise research inclusion and intervention uptake. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Co-author VB was a public co-investigator within the ADMISSION Research Collaborative. VB was involved from the outset of this project, contributing to the directive design, data interpretation workshops, critical review of the draft manuscript and approval of the final version. Findings from the study have also been discussed with the ADMISSION Patient Advisory Group, a diverse group of patients and carers with lived experience of MLTC who provided advice to ADMISSION Research Collaborative researchers at regular intervals throughout the lifetime of the funding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70868
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Public Perceptions of Multiple Long‐Term Conditions: An Analysis of Mass Observation Accounts

Victoria Bartle, Rachel Cooper, Sue Bellass, Avan Aihie Sayer et al.
Health Expectations
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
article

Public Perceptions of Multiple Long‐Term Conditions: An Analysis of Mass Observation Accounts

Victoria Bartle, Rachel Cooper, Sue Bellass, Avan Aihie Sayer, Thomas Scharf
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The growing number of people living with two or more long-term conditions presents challenges to medicine and society. While the terminology of 'multiple long-term conditions' (MLTC) or 'multimorbidity' has increasingly been adopted in research, policy and clinical practice, how the public responds to 'MLTC' remains underexplored. Given the important implications for research inclusion and intervention uptake, we aimed to address this gap by investigating public perceptions of MLTC. METHODS: Mass Observation Project respondents were invited to share their views on MLTC. We collated the five words that respondents were asked to provide when hearing the term 'multiple long-term health conditions' and compared the responses of people with and without MLTC. We then reviewed each full written account and identified categories describing the different ways in which the respondents referred to MLTC. RESULTS: Of 141 valid responses, 76 (53.9%) were written by people living with MLTC, two thirds of whom (67.1%) were aged 60 or over. Regardless of MLTC status, respondents predominantly associated MLTC with challenging embodied experiences such as pain and debilitation. We identified four types of response to 'MLTC': adopting, overlooking, resisting and rejecting. Around half the respondents (51.8%) adopted the construct, with 11.3% resisting or rejecting it due to concerns about its utility, incongruence with personal experience, or medicalisation of human experiences of illness. CONCLUSION: MLTC were predominantly associated with challenging embodied experiences, and the construct was not adopted by all respondents. Researchers, clinicians and policymakers should carefully consider how to describe the construct of MLTC in public-facing materials to optimise research inclusion and intervention uptake. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Co-author VB was a public co-investigator within the ADMISSION Research Collaborative. VB was involved from the outset of this project, contributing to the directive design, data interpretation workshops, critical review of the draft manuscript and approval of the final version. Findings from the study have also been discussed with the ADMISSION Patient Advisory Group, a diverse group of patients and carers with lived experience of MLTC who provided advice to ADMISSION Research Collaborative researchers at regular intervals throughout the lifetime of the funding.

Health ExpectationsVol. 29(5)
Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.