Results of the ESOSTAT multiple-center prospective study: analysis of 90-day postoperative morbidity and mortality after radical surgery for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer

Objective. To evaluate 90-day morbidity and mortality rates after elective radical surgery for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer within the prospective multiple-center study ESOSTAT. Material and methods. The study included 230 patients from 18 oncology hospitals in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus who underwent elective radical esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer or esophagogastric junction cancer (Siewert I–II) between March 18 and September 18, 2024. Complications were uniformly recorded using the ESODATA system with severity graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors of postoperative complications and mortality. Results. The 90-day mortality rate was 8.7%, in-hospital mortality — 4.8%. The overall complication rate was 41.3%, including surgical complications in 26.5% of patients and redo surgeries in 17.4% of cases. The most common complications were pulmonary (22.1%) and anastomotic leakage (11.3%). The mortality rate associated with anastomotic leakage was 19.2%. Multivariate analysis identified female sex (OR=0.732; 95% CI 0.548–0.978; p=0.035), ECOG status 2 (OR=10.142; 95% CI 1.575–65.366; p=0.015), surgery time (OR=1.003; 95% CI 1.001–1.005; p=0.006), and intraoperative blood loss (OR=1.001; 95% CI 1.000–1.002; p=0.027) as independent predictors of complications. Factors independently associated with 90-day mortality were Charlson comorbidity index >4 (OR=1.260; 95% CI 1.062–1.495; p=0.008), complicated course of esophageal cancer (OR=1.560; 95% CI 0.637–2.305; p=0.025), concomitant pulmonary diseases (OR=3.328; 95% CI 1.083–10.227; p=0.036), and any postoperative complication (OR=36.554; 95% CI 15.800–84.521; p<0.001). Conclusion. The ESOSTAT study is the first in Russia and Belarus to evaluate 90-day morbidity and mortality rates after esophagectomy. Our findings are comparable with international registries, support 90-day follow-up period and identify key prognostic factors. Risk factor analysis will allow patient stratification according to the likelihood of adverse outcomes, facilitate more rigorous patient selection, and ultimately improve safety of surgical treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202609250
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Results of the ESOSTAT multiple-center prospective study: analysis of 90-day postoperative morbidity and mortality after radical surgery for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer

S.A. Yeskov, S. V. Gamayunov, Г. Н. Хрыков, Vadim Agadzhanov et al.
Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Results of the ESOSTAT multiple-center prospective study: analysis of 90-day postoperative morbidity and mortality after radical surgery for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer

S.A. Yeskov, S. V. Gamayunov, Г. Н. Хрыков, Vadim Agadzhanov, Е. И. Смоленов, K. V. Kholomanova, Г. В. Афонин, Malik Agasiev, Paulina Smirnov, Д. В. Ерыгин, П. И. Назарьев, Roman Izrailov, Ruchkin Dv, N.M. Abdulkhakimov, V. M. Khomyakov, T. L. Sharapov, F.P. Vetshev, G. G. Torgomyan, Aidar Nigmatullin, Vadim Kozlov, Evgeniy N. Kolesnikov, Dmitrii Sekhniaidze, К.В. Трусов, А. B. Ryabov, S. A. Prokopyev, N. M. Kiselev, D.V. Lopatin, R.V. Kostenko, A.F. Bikmetov, A.E. Anisimov, I.I. Ibatullin
article en

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate 90-day morbidity and mortality rates after elective radical surgery for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer within the prospective multiple-center study ESOSTAT. Material and methods. The study included 230 patients from 18 oncology hospitals in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus who underwent elective radical esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer or esophagogastric junction cancer (Siewert I–II) between March 18 and September 18, 2024. Complications were uniformly recorded using the ESODATA system with severity graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors of postoperative complications and mortality. Results. The 90-day mortality rate was 8.7%, in-hospital mortality — 4.8%. The overall complication rate was 41.3%, including surgical complications in 26.5% of patients and redo surgeries in 17.4% of cases. The most common complications were pulmonary (22.1%) and anastomotic leakage (11.3%). The mortality rate associated with anastomotic leakage was 19.2%. Multivariate analysis identified female sex (OR=0.732; 95% CI 0.548–0.978; p=0.035), ECOG status 2 (OR=10.142; 95% CI 1.575–65.366; p=0.015), surgery time (OR=1.003; 95% CI 1.001–1.005; p=0.006), and intraoperative blood loss (OR=1.001; 95% CI 1.000–1.002; p=0.027) as independent predictors of complications. Factors independently associated with 90-day mortality were Charlson comorbidity index >4 (OR=1.260; 95% CI 1.062–1.495; p=0.008), complicated course of esophageal cancer (OR=1.560; 95% CI 0.637–2.305; p=0.025), concomitant pulmonary diseases (OR=3.328; 95% CI 1.083–10.227; p=0.036), and any postoperative complication (OR=36.554; 95% CI 15.800–84.521; p<0.001). Conclusion. The ESOSTAT study is the first in Russia and Belarus to evaluate 90-day morbidity and mortality rates after esophagectomy. Our findings are comparable with international registries, support 90-day follow-up period and identify key prognostic factors. Risk factor analysis will allow patient stratification according to the likelihood of adverse outcomes, facilitate more rigorous patient selection, and ultimately improve safety of surgical treatment.

Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery(9)
Sechenov University (RU), Moscow Clinical Scientific Center (RU), Leningrad Regional Cancer Center (RU), Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Center (RU), Medical Radiological Research Center (RU), Republican Oncological Clinical Dispensary (RU), City Clinical Hospital (RU), P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute (RU), State Healthcare Institution "Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary" (RU), Ulyanovsk Regional Oncology Center (RU), Republican Scientific and Practical Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery (BY), Moscow City Oncology Hospital №62 (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.