Do Political Connections Seek Green Rent? Only When Safe

ABSTRACT This study examines how and under what conditions political connections shape firms’ responses to environmental policies. Exploiting the staggered rollout of China's Low‐Carbon City Pilot (LCCP) policy, we find that firms connected to higher‐level governments engage in greater rent‐seeking under this weakly enforced policy. Although these firms receive more government resources, they do not outperform non‐connected firms in either environmental or financial outcomes. This effect is more pronounced when local governments have greater discretion in policy implementation and when firms operate in industries with greater environmental exposure. In contrast, strongly enforced regulations, such as central environmental inspections, mitigate the adverse effects of political connections, suggesting that connected firms engage in strategic rent‐seeking when regulatory oversight is weak. Our findings highlight the misalignment of incentives between firms and governments under certain environmental policies and underscore the importance of distinguishing policy design, enforcement intensity, and implementation discretion in understanding policy effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Review
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.70083
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Do Political Connections Seek Green Rent? Only When Safe

Ruoran Zhao, Tianxi Wang
Financial Review
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Do Political Connections Seek Green Rent? Only When Safe

Ruoran Zhao, Tianxi Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines how and under what conditions political connections shape firms’ responses to environmental policies. Exploiting the staggered rollout of China's Low‐Carbon City Pilot (LCCP) policy, we find that firms connected to higher‐level governments engage in greater rent‐seeking under this weakly enforced policy. Although these firms receive more government resources, they do not outperform non‐connected firms in either environmental or financial outcomes. This effect is more pronounced when local governments have greater discretion in policy implementation and when firms operate in industries with greater environmental exposure. In contrast, strongly enforced regulations, such as central environmental inspections, mitigate the adverse effects of political connections, suggesting that connected firms engage in strategic rent‐seeking when regulatory oversight is weak. Our findings highlight the misalignment of incentives between firms and governments under certain environmental policies and underscore the importance of distinguishing policy design, enforcement intensity, and implementation discretion in understanding policy effectiveness.

Financial Review
King's College London (GB), North Yorkshire County Council (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Political Connections Seek Green Rent? Only When Safe — Ruoran Zhao, Tianxi Wang · Financial Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS