Durum Wheat Responses to Organic and Conventional Management Systems: Agronomic Traits and Tissue-Specific Expression of Nitrogen Transport and Assimilation Genes

Efficient nitrogen acquisition and utilization are essential for sustainable wheat production in contrasting management systems. However, little is known about how genotype × management interactions are associated with tissue-specific expression of nitrogen (N)-related genes in durum wheat under organic and conventional field conditions. This study evaluated the agronomic, physiological, and molecular responses of 12 durum wheat genotypes (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum) grown under organic and conventional management during the 2022–2023 and 2023–2024 growing seasons. Six genotypes, comprising four higher-performing and two lower-performing genotypes, were selected for molecular analysis. The expression of ten genes involved in nitrate and ammonium transport and N assimilation was analyzed using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in leaf, stem, and root tissues. The mean grain yield was 4078.29 kg ha−1 under organic management and 3997.35 kg ha−1 under conventional management. Thus, mean grain yield was approximately 2.0% higher under organic management. Genotypic responses differed between the two systems: AYM-6 had the highest grain yield under conventional management (5201.92 kg ha−1), whereas AYM-3 had the highest grain yield under organic management (5059.72 kg ha−1). Among the ten genes, NRT2.1 and GS1 had higher transcript abundance under conventional management, whereas the other eight had higher transcript abundance under organic management. GS1 generally had the highest transcript abundance, while NRT1 had the lowest. Gene expression was strongly tissue-dependent, with leaves generally showing the highest transcript levels. Gene–trait analysis further revealed a positive relationship between leaf NRT2.1 expression and grain yield under conventional management (R2 = 0.78, p = 0.020) and a negative relationship between root NRT1.1 expression and grain yield under organic management (R2 = 0.68, p = 0.043). The results showed management- and genotype-specific agronomic responses, while selected N-related gene-expression patterns were associated with grain yield in a tissue- and management-dependent manner. These findings support the evaluation and selection of durum wheat genotypes directly within the target management system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16181963
Primary Topic
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Durum Wheat Responses to Organic and Conventional Management Systems: Agronomic Traits and Tissue-Specific Expression of Nitrogen Transport and Assimilation Genes

Remzi ÖZKAN
Agriculture
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
article

Durum Wheat Responses to Organic and Conventional Management Systems: Agronomic Traits and Tissue-Specific Expression of Nitrogen Transport and Assimilation Genes

Remzi ÖZKAN
article en

Abstract

Efficient nitrogen acquisition and utilization are essential for sustainable wheat production in contrasting management systems. However, little is known about how genotype × management interactions are associated with tissue-specific expression of nitrogen (N)-related genes in durum wheat under organic and conventional field conditions. This study evaluated the agronomic, physiological, and molecular responses of 12 durum wheat genotypes (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum) grown under organic and conventional management during the 2022–2023 and 2023–2024 growing seasons. Six genotypes, comprising four higher-performing and two lower-performing genotypes, were selected for molecular analysis. The expression of ten genes involved in nitrate and ammonium transport and N assimilation was analyzed using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in leaf, stem, and root tissues. The mean grain yield was 4078.29 kg ha−1 under organic management and 3997.35 kg ha−1 under conventional management. Thus, mean grain yield was approximately 2.0% higher under organic management. Genotypic responses differed between the two systems: AYM-6 had the highest grain yield under conventional management (5201.92 kg ha−1), whereas AYM-3 had the highest grain yield under organic management (5059.72 kg ha−1). Among the ten genes, NRT2.1 and GS1 had higher transcript abundance under conventional management, whereas the other eight had higher transcript abundance under organic management. GS1 generally had the highest transcript abundance, while NRT1 had the lowest. Gene expression was strongly tissue-dependent, with leaves generally showing the highest transcript levels. Gene–trait analysis further revealed a positive relationship between leaf NRT2.1 expression and grain yield under conventional management (R2 = 0.78, p = 0.020) and a negative relationship between root NRT1.1 expression and grain yield under organic management (R2 = 0.68, p = 0.043). The results showed management- and genotype-specific agronomic responses, while selected N-related gene-expression patterns were associated with grain yield in a tissue- and management-dependent manner. These findings support the evaluation and selection of durum wheat genotypes directly within the target management system.

AgricultureVol. 16(18)
Hakkari University (TR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.