Real-world outcomes of ribociclib treatment in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors

Background This study evaluated the real-world efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with ribociclib.Research design and methods This retrospective single-center study included 110 patients treated with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy between January 2023 and January 2026. PFS was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Prognostic factors were assessed using Cox regression. A 3-month landmark analysis evaluated early dose modification and grade 3–4 neutropenia, and sensitivity analyses assessed model assumptions.Results Median follow-up was 35.0 months (95% CI: 30.2–39.8), and median PFS for the overall cohort was 31.0 months (95% CI: 24.5–37.5). PFS did not differ significantly between first-line and later-line ribociclib use (p = 0.148). Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 36.4%, and 36.4% required dose modification. In multivariable analysis, each 10-percentage-point increase in Ki-67 was associated with shorter PFS (HR = 1.203; 95% CI: 1.007–1.436; p = 0.041). Neither early dose modification nor early grade 3–4 neutropenia was significantly associated with subsequent PFS.Conclusions Ribociclib demonstrated clinically meaningful PFS with manageable toxicity in real-world practice. Higher Ki-67 was associated with poorer PFS, although this association was attenuated in sensitivity analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2026.2733826
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world outcomes of ribociclib treatment in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors

Doğan Yazılıtaş, Mustafa Altınbaş, Salih Karatlı
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Real-world outcomes of ribociclib treatment in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors

Doğan Yazılıtaş, Mustafa Altınbaş, Salih Karatlı
article en

Abstract

Background This study evaluated the real-world efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with ribociclib.Research design and methods This retrospective single-center study included 110 patients treated with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy between January 2023 and January 2026. PFS was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Prognostic factors were assessed using Cox regression. A 3-month landmark analysis evaluated early dose modification and grade 3–4 neutropenia, and sensitivity analyses assessed model assumptions.Results Median follow-up was 35.0 months (95% CI: 30.2–39.8), and median PFS for the overall cohort was 31.0 months (95% CI: 24.5–37.5). PFS did not differ significantly between first-line and later-line ribociclib use (p = 0.148). Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 36.4%, and 36.4% required dose modification. In multivariable analysis, each 10-percentage-point increase in Ki-67 was associated with shorter PFS (HR = 1.203; 95% CI: 1.007–1.436; p = 0.041). Neither early dose modification nor early grade 3–4 neutropenia was significantly associated with subsequent PFS.Conclusions Ribociclib demonstrated clinically meaningful PFS with manageable toxicity in real-world practice. Higher Ki-67 was associated with poorer PFS, although this association was attenuated in sensitivity analysis.

Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
City Hospital (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.