Educating minds with generative AI

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly entering education, framed as a tool for efficiency and personalization. In this Perspective, we argue this obscures a deeper transformation. Schools are cognitive ecologies in which tools and social practices actively shape learning. GenAI restructures this ecology, redistributing epistemic labour, consolidating pedagogical functions, and reorganizing how knowledge is accessed, produced, and evaluated. Unlike most educational technologies, it is active, persistent, and generalist. We identify two enduring misalignments: a pedagogical gap between learning sciences and AI design, and a goal gap between measurable performance and developmental aims. Both gaps reflect logics already embedded within existing educational systems organized around efficiency, standardization, and control. GenAI does not introduce but risks entrenching and amplifying these gaps. Rather than accommodating GenAI through technical adjustments, we propose treating it as a diagnostic opportunity to redesign schooling for embodied, collaborative, and distinctly human forms of learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Psychology
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00522-8
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Educating minds with generative AI

Laura Desirèe Di Paolo, Andy Clark, Thomas Wachter
Communications Psychology
Digital Education and Society
article

Educating minds with generative AI

Laura Desirèe Di Paolo, Andy Clark, Thomas Wachter
article en

Abstract

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly entering education, framed as a tool for efficiency and personalization. In this Perspective, we argue this obscures a deeper transformation. Schools are cognitive ecologies in which tools and social practices actively shape learning. GenAI restructures this ecology, redistributing epistemic labour, consolidating pedagogical functions, and reorganizing how knowledge is accessed, produced, and evaluated. Unlike most educational technologies, it is active, persistent, and generalist. We identify two enduring misalignments: a pedagogical gap between learning sciences and AI design, and a goal gap between measurable performance and developmental aims. Both gaps reflect logics already embedded within existing educational systems organized around efficiency, standardization, and control. GenAI does not introduce but risks entrenching and amplifying these gaps. Rather than accommodating GenAI through technical adjustments, we propose treating it as a diagnostic opportunity to redesign schooling for embodied, collaborative, and distinctly human forms of learning.

Communications PsychologyVol. 4(1)
University of Sussex (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.