Effective Judicial Protection in Enforcement Proceedings: Case No. 3-11/0111

This publication provides an in-depth doctrinal and procedural analysis of judicial enforcement proceedings in Case No. 3-11/0111 before the Latgale District Court (Preiļi Courthouse), concerning enforcement case No. 00659/016/2025 and the “Brodi” property. The study examines access to effective judicial protection, judicial review of bailiff actions, suspension of enforcement, procedural admissibility, security-deposit requirements, appellate review and the consequences of procedural delay. Particular attention is given to the interaction between Sections 133 and 632 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Law and the guarantees arising from Articles 92 and 105 of the Constitution of Latvia, Article 6 ECHR, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the ECHR, and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The publication is based on court decisions, procedural documents and supporting documentary evidence and is intended for academic, comparative-law and institutional examination.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22758899
Primary Topic
Energy Law and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effective Judicial Protection in Enforcement Proceedings: Case No. 3-11/0111

Diks Ancveirs
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Energy Law and Policy
article

Effective Judicial Protection in Enforcement Proceedings: Case No. 3-11/0111

Diks Ancveirs
article en

Abstract

This publication provides an in-depth doctrinal and procedural analysis of judicial enforcement proceedings in Case No. 3-11/0111 before the Latgale District Court (Preiļi Courthouse), concerning enforcement case No. 00659/016/2025 and the “Brodi” property. The study examines access to effective judicial protection, judicial review of bailiff actions, suspension of enforcement, procedural admissibility, security-deposit requirements, appellate review and the consequences of procedural delay. Particular attention is given to the interaction between Sections 133 and 632 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Law and the guarantees arising from Articles 92 and 105 of the Constitution of Latvia, Article 6 ECHR, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the ECHR, and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The publication is based on court decisions, procedural documents and supporting documentary evidence and is intended for academic, comparative-law and institutional examination.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Energy Law and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.