Regulating a Floating Signifier: Interpretations of “Data” in the Digital Services Act Researcher Access Provision

The European Union's Digital Services Act promises to disrupt the power held by platform companies to determine how data needed to understand risks is accessed by researchers. Article 40 brings researcher data access into a governance of platforms framework, but how data are conceptualized in this regime is overlooked. This article uses discourse analysis to examine how data are understood in the legal texts, public submissions of feedback during the drafting process and published data catalogs by the platforms that fall within the regulation. I argue that the meaning of data “floats” across and within regulatory and commercial discourses, aligning and disconnecting with how data are understood in research disciplines. Platform companies narrowly interpret and operationalize data as aggregated, quantified presentations structured through predefined datasets, which is in tension with the multiplicity of understandings of data in academic research. The attempt to narrow the definitional boundaries of data seeks to impose limitations on how researchers might envisage data for their academic work, which is overlooked in current discussions of this data access provision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media Technology and Governance
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29777984261486601
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Regulating a Floating Signifier: Interpretations of “Data” in the Digital Services Act Researcher Access Provision

Taylor Annabell
Media Technology and Governance
Research Data Management Practices
article

Regulating a Floating Signifier: Interpretations of “Data” in the Digital Services Act Researcher Access Provision

Taylor Annabell
article en

Abstract

The European Union's Digital Services Act promises to disrupt the power held by platform companies to determine how data needed to understand risks is accessed by researchers. Article 40 brings researcher data access into a governance of platforms framework, but how data are conceptualized in this regime is overlooked. This article uses discourse analysis to examine how data are understood in the legal texts, public submissions of feedback during the drafting process and published data catalogs by the platforms that fall within the regulation. I argue that the meaning of data “floats” across and within regulatory and commercial discourses, aligning and disconnecting with how data are understood in research disciplines. Platform companies narrowly interpret and operationalize data as aggregated, quantified presentations structured through predefined datasets, which is in tension with the multiplicity of understandings of data in academic research. The attempt to narrow the definitional boundaries of data seeks to impose limitations on how researchers might envisage data for their academic work, which is overlooked in current discussions of this data access provision.

Media Technology and Governance
Cardiff University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.