The utility of planning mandates for climate action plans in the United States: lessons from a multi-jurisdictional study

This study analyzes data from the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Priority Climate Action Plan Directory to understand whether plan weaknesses in climate action plan (CAP) literature are addressed in the plans submitted by states, metropolitan statistical areas, and tribes and territories to the agency. Analysis reveals that planning mandates backed by funding and technical assistance consistently addressed CAP weaknesses – particularly, limited attention to equity and co-benefits. Although data limitations and predominance of mitigation actions persist, findings suggest that comprehensive planning mandates with dedicated funding and technical assistance can enable jurisdictions to address plan weaknesses and drive equitable climate action planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Planning Practice and Research
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2026.2731070
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The utility of planning mandates for climate action plans in the United States: lessons from a multi-jurisdictional study

Seth Asare Okyere, Stephen Kofi Diko
Planning Practice and Research
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

The utility of planning mandates for climate action plans in the United States: lessons from a multi-jurisdictional study

Seth Asare Okyere, Stephen Kofi Diko
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes data from the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Priority Climate Action Plan Directory to understand whether plan weaknesses in climate action plan (CAP) literature are addressed in the plans submitted by states, metropolitan statistical areas, and tribes and territories to the agency. Analysis reveals that planning mandates backed by funding and technical assistance consistently addressed CAP weaknesses – particularly, limited attention to equity and co-benefits. Although data limitations and predominance of mitigation actions persist, findings suggest that comprehensive planning mandates with dedicated funding and technical assistance can enable jurisdictions to address plan weaknesses and drive equitable climate action planning.

Planning Practice and Research
University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Memphis (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The utility of planning mandates for climate action plans in the United States: lessons from a multi-jurisdictional study — Seth Asare Okyere, Stephen Kofi Diko · Planning Practice and Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS