The Legalisation of Foreign Political Financing: Who Really Funds Democracy?

On 15 February 2024, India's Supreme Court delivered one of the most consequential rulings on political finance anywhere in the democratic world, declaring the Electoral Bonds Scheme unconstitutional and manifestly arbitrary. The scheme, introduced in 2017, had allowed individuals and companies to donate to political parties through anonymous bearer instruments, and a parallel change to the law governing foreign contributions meant that money from foreign-owned companies could flow into it without being classified as foreign at all. The ruling forced open, for the first time, a real picture of who had been funding Indian democracy, and it raised a wider question that reaches far beyond India: when a country writes rules that formally prohibit foreign money in elections while leaving the door open to it in practice, has that country actually banned foreign influence, or has it merely legalised it under a different name?

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev10i3-1723048
Primary Topic
Political Developments and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Legalisation of Foreign Political Financing: Who Really Funds Democracy?

Eva Naik
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Political Developments and Conflicts
article

The Legalisation of Foreign Political Financing: Who Really Funds Democracy?

Eva Naik
article en

Abstract

On 15 February 2024, India's Supreme Court delivered one of the most consequential rulings on political finance anywhere in the democratic world, declaring the Electoral Bonds Scheme unconstitutional and manifestly arbitrary. The scheme, introduced in 2017, had allowed individuals and companies to donate to political parties through anonymous bearer instruments, and a parallel change to the law governing foreign contributions meant that money from foreign-owned companies could flow into it without being classified as foreign at all. The ruling forced open, for the first time, a real picture of who had been funding Indian democracy, and it raised a wider question that reaches far beyond India: when a country writes rules that formally prohibit foreign money in elections while leaving the door open to it in practice, has that country actually banned foreign influence, or has it merely legalised it under a different name?

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 10(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Developments and Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.