Single-shot comparison of random quantum channels and measurements

We analyze the task of deciding whether two unknown quantum devices are identical or independent, for arbitrary quantum channels and generalized measurements (POVMs) drawn at random from Haar-Stinespring ensembles, in the single-shot regime in which each device is used exactly once. Our contribution is twofold. First, in the symmetric setting, in which both types of error are treated on an equal footing, we derive a closed-form expression for the optimal success probability and show that it is achieved by a universal, parameter-free strategy: an antisymmetric two-copy input state followed by a projection onto the symmetric and antisymmetric subspaces of the outputs, with no additional ancillary systems required. Second, in the asymmetric (hypothesis-testing) setting we reduce the problem to a simple linear program and derive explicit type-I/type-II error trade-off curves for deterministic fixed-input protocols, for which the optimal input depends on the allowed type-I error; remarkably, classical randomization—equivalently, an untouched side register correlated with the input choice—can strictly improve the asymmetric performance by convexifying the deterministic trade-off, in sharp contrast to the symmetric setting. Finally, we show that the type-I error can be made to vanish without trivializing the test only in the environment-free case, corresponding to isometric channels, and for von Neumann measurements; for any genuinely noisy dynamics both types of error remain strictly positive in every nontrivial comparison scheme.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-70695-z
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single-shot comparison of random quantum channels and measurements

Marcin Markiewicz, Łukasz Pawela, Zbigniew Puchała
Scientific Reports
Quantum Information and Cryptography
article

Single-shot comparison of random quantum channels and measurements

Marcin Markiewicz, Łukasz Pawela, Zbigniew Puchała
article en

Abstract

We analyze the task of deciding whether two unknown quantum devices are identical or independent, for arbitrary quantum channels and generalized measurements (POVMs) drawn at random from Haar-Stinespring ensembles, in the single-shot regime in which each device is used exactly once. Our contribution is twofold. First, in the symmetric setting, in which both types of error are treated on an equal footing, we derive a closed-form expression for the optimal success probability and show that it is achieved by a universal, parameter-free strategy: an antisymmetric two-copy input state followed by a projection onto the symmetric and antisymmetric subspaces of the outputs, with no additional ancillary systems required. Second, in the asymmetric (hypothesis-testing) setting we reduce the problem to a simple linear program and derive explicit type-I/type-II error trade-off curves for deterministic fixed-input protocols, for which the optimal input depends on the allowed type-I error; remarkably, classical randomization—equivalently, an untouched side register correlated with the input choice—can strictly improve the asymmetric performance by convexifying the deterministic trade-off, in sharp contrast to the symmetric setting. Finally, we show that the type-I error can be made to vanish without trivializing the test only in the environment-free case, corresponding to isometric channels, and for von Neumann measurements; for any genuinely noisy dynamics both types of error remain strictly positive in every nontrivial comparison scheme.

Scientific Reports
University of Gdańsk (PL), Institute of Theoretical and Applied Informatics (PL), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Quantum Information and Cryptography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.