Early Post-Operative Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leak by Local Electrophysiological Parameters: Multicenter Pilot Study

Background: Morbidity associated with anastomotic leak (AL) can be reduced by timely detection. Local electrophysiological parameters are highly sensitive to pathophysiological processes (inflammation/ischemia) underlying AL and may enable early post-op monitoring ahead of clinical signs. A new approach to early leak detection includes post-operative measurement of bioelectric activity of the GI tract. The method has been implemented in a medical device that uses electrodes embedded in a standard surgical drain to continuously monitor local bowel myoelectric activity following GI surgery. Methods: A multicenter pilot study evaluated the performance of the device to support detection of clinically recognizable anastomotic leaks on post-operative day 3. The device’s technology collected data that an algorithm classified to predict AL. Data were collected for a duration of 3–10 days, while the surgical drain was in place (without affecting routine care). Pilot endpoints were safety and performance analyses: sensitivity and specificity. Results: Fifty patients from 6 medical centers (mean age: 63.6 ± 13.3 years; 38% male) undergoing elective anterior resection (laparoscopic (N = 26), robotic (N = 16), open (N = 8)) for cancer (N = 44), diverticulitis (N = 4), and rectal prolapse (N = 2) were included. Average anastomotic height was 9 ± 5 cm from the anal verge. Grade C ALs were observed in 6.0% (N = 3) of the patients, resulting in increased hospitalization time (6.4 ± 2.4 days with no leak vs. 15.0 ± 7.9 days with Grade C leak). In this N = 50 cohort, the device had 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity at POD3 in prediction of Grade C leaks. Given the small number of events (three Grade C leaks, seven leaks overall), these results are preliminary. No device-related serious adverse events were observed, and the standard drain form factor contributed to positive usability feedback. Conclusions: Pilot data suggest that the bioelectric sensing drain device is safe and warrants further evaluation as a potential adjunct for AL detection. The small study sample size and wide confidence intervals for key outcomes require confirmation in a pivotal diagnostic accuracy study with a fixed thresholding algorithm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16182969
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Early Post-Operative Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leak by Local Electrophysiological Parameters: Multicenter Pilot Study

Ilana Fishman, Nir Wasserberg, Uri Netz, V Gaziants et al.
Diagnostics
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Early Post-Operative Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leak by Local Electrophysiological Parameters: Multicenter Pilot Study

Ilana Fishman, Nir Wasserberg, Uri Netz, V Gaziants, S. Policker, Elchanan Quint, Charles H. Knowles, Matan Ben‐David, Ian White, Oded Zmora, Avi Reshef, Hagit Tulchinsky, Barak Bar‐Zakai, Lior Segev, Erez Shor, Yulie Hagani, Rafael Miller, Ilia Pinsk, Gilad Lerman, Udi Shenker
article en

Abstract

Background: Morbidity associated with anastomotic leak (AL) can be reduced by timely detection. Local electrophysiological parameters are highly sensitive to pathophysiological processes (inflammation/ischemia) underlying AL and may enable early post-op monitoring ahead of clinical signs. A new approach to early leak detection includes post-operative measurement of bioelectric activity of the GI tract. The method has been implemented in a medical device that uses electrodes embedded in a standard surgical drain to continuously monitor local bowel myoelectric activity following GI surgery. Methods: A multicenter pilot study evaluated the performance of the device to support detection of clinically recognizable anastomotic leaks on post-operative day 3. The device’s technology collected data that an algorithm classified to predict AL. Data were collected for a duration of 3–10 days, while the surgical drain was in place (without affecting routine care). Pilot endpoints were safety and performance analyses: sensitivity and specificity. Results: Fifty patients from 6 medical centers (mean age: 63.6 ± 13.3 years; 38% male) undergoing elective anterior resection (laparoscopic (N = 26), robotic (N = 16), open (N = 8)) for cancer (N = 44), diverticulitis (N = 4), and rectal prolapse (N = 2) were included. Average anastomotic height was 9 ± 5 cm from the anal verge. Grade C ALs were observed in 6.0% (N = 3) of the patients, resulting in increased hospitalization time (6.4 ± 2.4 days with no leak vs. 15.0 ± 7.9 days with Grade C leak). In this N = 50 cohort, the device had 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity at POD3 in prediction of Grade C leaks. Given the small number of events (three Grade C leaks, seven leaks overall), these results are preliminary. No device-related serious adverse events were observed, and the standard drain form factor contributed to positive usability feedback. Conclusions: Pilot data suggest that the bioelectric sensing drain device is safe and warrants further evaluation as a potential adjunct for AL detection. The small study sample size and wide confidence intervals for key outcomes require confirmation in a pivotal diagnostic accuracy study with a fixed thresholding algorithm.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(18)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Tel Aviv University (IL), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Sheba Medical Center (IL), Kaplan Medical Center (IL), Rabin Medical Center (IL), Soroka Medical Center (IL), Jersey City Medical Center (US), Assaf Harofeh Medical Center (IL), Cleveland Clinic London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.