Improving family functioning and wellbeing among families of children with disabilities in Rwanda: an application of the SAFE child protection model

Background Families of children with disabilities in low-resource settings face heightened challenges to family functioning and wellbeing. Improving a child and caregiver’s environment in these settings requires a broader understanding of the family ecosystem. This study aims to investigate factors that should be considered to enhance family functioning and inform family-centered interventions. Methodology We conducted 34 in-depth interviews with 30 caregivers of children with disabilities aged 6–8 years enrolled in a larger cluster randomized trial of the Sugira Muryango parenting intervention. Additionally, six focus group discussions were conducted with 36 community workers, and 6 Early Childhood Developmental (ECD) advocates participants. Guided by the SAFE Model for child protection, content analysis was used to understand threats to child protection and caregivers’ well-being among caregivers of children with disabilities enrolled in Sugira Muryango. Results Consistent with the domains outlined in the SAFE Model, our analysis revealed the following threats to child safety: 1) Safety/Freedom from harm, including father’s mental health and substance abuse, abandonment and stigma related to a child’s disability; 2) Access to basic physiological needs and healthcare, including lack of basic necessities (food, utilities and housing), additional needs related to caring for a child with disabilities, caregiver mental health needs, limited access to health insurance and mother illness; 3) Family and connection to others, including the single-parent dilemma, lack of support from family and community, and father abandonment; and 4) Education and economic security, including additional expenses due to the child’s disability and financial stress related to health care costs. Conclusion Improving family functioning and wellbeing among caregivers of children with disabilities in limited resources requires a deep understanding of socioecological forces operating on the family system. These findings provide further evidence of how the threats to child safety highlighted by the SAFE Model can inform how researchers, and policy makers design and implement family-centered interventions tailored to children with disabilities in low-resource settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1906171
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Improving family functioning and wellbeing among families of children with disabilities in Rwanda: an application of the SAFE child protection model

Vincent Sezibera, Alain Ahishakiye, Roberto Baiocco, Wijnand van den Boom et al.
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Family and Disability Support Research
article

Improving family functioning and wellbeing among families of children with disabilities in Rwanda: an application of the SAFE child protection model

Vincent Sezibera, Alain Ahishakiye, Roberto Baiocco, Wijnand van den Boom, Sarah K. G. Jensen, Hannah Gilbert, M.C. Smith Fawzi, Leila Dal Santo, Ann Miller, Theresa S. Betancourt, Kim Wilson, Candace J. Black, Mukeshimana Verena, Cat Kirk
article en

Abstract

Background Families of children with disabilities in low-resource settings face heightened challenges to family functioning and wellbeing. Improving a child and caregiver’s environment in these settings requires a broader understanding of the family ecosystem. This study aims to investigate factors that should be considered to enhance family functioning and inform family-centered interventions. Methodology We conducted 34 in-depth interviews with 30 caregivers of children with disabilities aged 6–8 years enrolled in a larger cluster randomized trial of the Sugira Muryango parenting intervention. Additionally, six focus group discussions were conducted with 36 community workers, and 6 Early Childhood Developmental (ECD) advocates participants. Guided by the SAFE Model for child protection, content analysis was used to understand threats to child protection and caregivers’ well-being among caregivers of children with disabilities enrolled in Sugira Muryango. Results Consistent with the domains outlined in the SAFE Model, our analysis revealed the following threats to child safety: 1) Safety/Freedom from harm, including father’s mental health and substance abuse, abandonment and stigma related to a child’s disability; 2) Access to basic physiological needs and healthcare, including lack of basic necessities (food, utilities and housing), additional needs related to caring for a child with disabilities, caregiver mental health needs, limited access to health insurance and mother illness; 3) Family and connection to others, including the single-parent dilemma, lack of support from family and community, and father abandonment; and 4) Education and economic security, including additional expenses due to the child’s disability and financial stress related to health care costs. Conclusion Improving family functioning and wellbeing among caregivers of children with disabilities in limited resources requires a deep understanding of socioecological forces operating on the family system. These findings provide further evidence of how the threats to child safety highlighted by the SAFE Model can inform how researchers, and policy makers design and implement family-centered interventions tailored to children with disabilities in low-resource settings.

Frontiers in PsychiatryVol. 17
Boston Children's Hospital (US), Partners In Health (US), Harvard University (US), University of Rwanda (RW), Neuropsychiatric Research Institute (US), Maternity and Children's Hospital (SA), Boston Children's Museum (US), Harvard Global Health Institute (US), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Family and Disability Support Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.