Sustaining the open society: resources from Popperian science

Abstract Open society liberalism has experienced a revival in the 21st century, prominently led by Gerald Gaus. Despite its growing popularity, however, the boundaries of whose moral and political perspectives ought to be included remain underspecified. Its most famous early defender, Popper, thought that unreasonable individuals, such as those who hold to beliefs dogmatically, should be excluded from the open society. A belief not unusual among other liberal theorists. However, what these open society theorists miss is a possible underutilized resource that comes from Popper’s philosophy of science. Within science, Popper believed that dogmatic individuals were necessary and important for scientific progress. Using this resource, I argue that Popper himself and other open society theorists in general should be more inclusive and tolerant of closed society individuals, including dogmatic religious individuals, because they allow for liberal progress and the sustainment of the open society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05815-3
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Sustaining the open society: resources from Popperian science

Noah Jee-yoon Kim
Synthese
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Sustaining the open society: resources from Popperian science

Noah Jee-yoon Kim
article en

Abstract

Abstract Open society liberalism has experienced a revival in the 21st century, prominently led by Gerald Gaus. Despite its growing popularity, however, the boundaries of whose moral and political perspectives ought to be included remain underspecified. Its most famous early defender, Popper, thought that unreasonable individuals, such as those who hold to beliefs dogmatically, should be excluded from the open society. A belief not unusual among other liberal theorists. However, what these open society theorists miss is a possible underutilized resource that comes from Popper’s philosophy of science. Within science, Popper believed that dogmatic individuals were necessary and important for scientific progress. Using this resource, I argue that Popper himself and other open society theorists in general should be more inclusive and tolerant of closed society individuals, including dogmatic religious individuals, because they allow for liberal progress and the sustainment of the open society.

SyntheseVol. 208(3)
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.