The limits of community housing regulation

What is the purpose of community housing regulation and what can we hope it might achieve? This article examines the National Regulatory System for Community Housing (NRSCH) and its effective standardisation of non-government housing regulation across Australia. In particular, the article explores the relevance of the NRSCH to remote community housing in Australia’s Northern Territory (NT). As a unique context for which the NRSCH was not designed, but where its application has been promoted as a means to grow a community housing sector, this case study highlights the limits of community housing regulation, including for more ‘mainstream’ contexts. We consider the promise of community housing regulation as a mechanism to increase community control of remote housing, while highlighting the challenges of replicating this bureaucratic arrangement for remote communities. The article argues that the benefits of community housing regulation are only likely to be reaped where supportive policy frameworks and reliable government investment are also established and sustained.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Housing Studies
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2026.2730268
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The limits of community housing regulation

Megan Moskos, Liam Grealy, Richard Benedict, Finola Laughren
Housing Studies
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

The limits of community housing regulation

Megan Moskos, Liam Grealy, Richard Benedict, Finola Laughren
article en

Abstract

What is the purpose of community housing regulation and what can we hope it might achieve? This article examines the National Regulatory System for Community Housing (NRSCH) and its effective standardisation of non-government housing regulation across Australia. In particular, the article explores the relevance of the NRSCH to remote community housing in Australia’s Northern Territory (NT). As a unique context for which the NRSCH was not designed, but where its application has been promoted as a means to grow a community housing sector, this case study highlights the limits of community housing regulation, including for more ‘mainstream’ contexts. We consider the promise of community housing regulation as a mechanism to increase community control of remote housing, while highlighting the challenges of replicating this bureaucratic arrangement for remote communities. The article argues that the benefits of community housing regulation are only likely to be reaped where supportive policy frameworks and reliable government investment are also established and sustained.

Housing Studies
Charles Darwin University (AU), Menzies School of Health Research (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The limits of community housing regulation — Megan Moskos, Liam Grealy, et al. · Housing Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS