Why Integration Compounds A Threshold Theory of Technology Transfer and Global Value Chains

The returns to integration into global value chains split by level of development: integration raises productivity and growth in emerging and faster-growing economies, but not in slower-growing developing ones. The split is established, but no formal model accounts for its consequences; this paper supplies one. A government and a private importer bargain over how much technology to import and who bears its risk, while national capability accumulates alongside the firm-level technology stock. Because the two parties accumulate different things, the importer under-invests, and the resulting wedge has two independent components that always point the same way. Below a capability threshold imported technology is neither retained nor learned from, so nothing carries forward; above it both channels operate and integration compounds. The paper characterises a threshold's consequences rather than deriving one. Its central result is a reachable frontier in chain ambition: it contracts as the cost of public funds rises and widens with the government's patience, both proved in a limiting case, generating a trap in which every reachable chain is unviable and every viable one unreachable. The model predicts that integration becomes self-reinforcing only above the threshold, which a panel of 39 economies illustrates without testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22755501
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Why Integration Compounds A Threshold Theory of Technology Transfer and Global Value Chains

Milad Naeimi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Global trade and economics
preprint

Why Integration Compounds A Threshold Theory of Technology Transfer and Global Value Chains

Milad Naeimi
preprint en

Abstract

The returns to integration into global value chains split by level of development: integration raises productivity and growth in emerging and faster-growing economies, but not in slower-growing developing ones. The split is established, but no formal model accounts for its consequences; this paper supplies one. A government and a private importer bargain over how much technology to import and who bears its risk, while national capability accumulates alongside the firm-level technology stock. Because the two parties accumulate different things, the importer under-invests, and the resulting wedge has two independent components that always point the same way. Below a capability threshold imported technology is neither retained nor learned from, so nothing carries forward; above it both channels operate and integration compounds. The paper characterises a threshold's consequences rather than deriving one. Its central result is a reachable frontier in chain ambition: it contracts as the cost of public funds rises and widens with the government's patience, both proved in a limiting case, generating a trap in which every reachable chain is unviable and every viable one unreachable. The model predicts that integration becomes self-reinforcing only above the threshold, which a panel of 39 economies illustrates without testing.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Toronto (CA)
Decent work and economic growth
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.