Gaining a comprehensive understanding of antimicrobial resistance in dental education: a mixed methods study protocol

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most pressing global health challenges of the 21st century, driven in part by suboptimal prescription of antibiotics. Most antibiotic use worldwide occurs in outpatient settings, including dental practice, where dentists account for approximately 5–11% of all prescriptions. Educational environments play a critical role in shaping prescribing behaviors early in professional development, and interventions implemented during undergraduate training are more effective at changing clinical practice than those introduced later in clinical careers. However, research on how dental curricula, institutional culture, and stakeholder perspectives influence antimicrobial stewardship education is limited. Therefore, this study proposes a comprehensive evaluation of antibiotic prescribing practices and AMR education across all dental schools in Québec, Canada. Methods Using a convergent mixed methods design, the project integrates quantitative and qualitative approaches to examine knowledge, attitudes, prescribing patterns, and educational content about antibiotics and AMR. Quantitative components include a cross-sectional survey of dental students and a retrospective analysis of antibiotic prescriptions within undergraduate clinics. Qualitative components include focus groups with students and interviews with clinical instructors and academic administrators, guided by the Health Belief Model and the Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement (ADKAR) model. A curricular document analysis will further explore how antimicrobial stewardship principles are taught and implemented across institutions. Findings will be integrated through a mixed methods matrix to identify convergences, gaps, and opportunities for educational change. Discussion This work advances current research by moving beyond traditional survey-based assessments toward a holistic, multi-stakeholder understanding of antibiotic prescribing in dental education. By linking student and educator insights with clinical practice data, the study aims to generate actionable knowledge to aid curriculum developers, clinical practitioners, and policy shapers to optimize antibiotic use and mitigate antimicrobial resistance. Study protocol registration https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/193.html , # PJT183763.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1943489
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Gaining a comprehensive understanding of antimicrobial resistance in dental education: a mixed methods study protocol

Mary Ellen Macdonald, Wendy Somerville, Fatiha Chandad, Alissa Levine et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Gaining a comprehensive understanding of antimicrobial resistance in dental education: a mixed methods study protocol

Mary Ellen Macdonald, Wendy Somerville, Fatiha Chandad, Alissa Levine, Roger Junges, Fernanda C. Petersen, Quan Nha Hong, Annie Mao, Isaac Montgomery, Christophe Bedos, Belinda Nicolau, Safae Benali Lietefti, Sreenath Madathil, Aimee Dawson, Robert Durand
article en

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most pressing global health challenges of the 21st century, driven in part by suboptimal prescription of antibiotics. Most antibiotic use worldwide occurs in outpatient settings, including dental practice, where dentists account for approximately 5–11% of all prescriptions. Educational environments play a critical role in shaping prescribing behaviors early in professional development, and interventions implemented during undergraduate training are more effective at changing clinical practice than those introduced later in clinical careers. However, research on how dental curricula, institutional culture, and stakeholder perspectives influence antimicrobial stewardship education is limited. Therefore, this study proposes a comprehensive evaluation of antibiotic prescribing practices and AMR education across all dental schools in Québec, Canada. Methods Using a convergent mixed methods design, the project integrates quantitative and qualitative approaches to examine knowledge, attitudes, prescribing patterns, and educational content about antibiotics and AMR. Quantitative components include a cross-sectional survey of dental students and a retrospective analysis of antibiotic prescriptions within undergraduate clinics. Qualitative components include focus groups with students and interviews with clinical instructors and academic administrators, guided by the Health Belief Model and the Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement (ADKAR) model. A curricular document analysis will further explore how antimicrobial stewardship principles are taught and implemented across institutions. Findings will be integrated through a mixed methods matrix to identify convergences, gaps, and opportunities for educational change. Discussion This work advances current research by moving beyond traditional survey-based assessments toward a holistic, multi-stakeholder understanding of antibiotic prescribing in dental education. By linking student and educator insights with clinical practice data, the study aims to generate actionable knowledge to aid curriculum developers, clinical practitioners, and policy shapers to optimize antibiotic use and mitigate antimicrobial resistance. Study protocol registration https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/193.html , # PJT183763.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
University of Oslo (NO), Primary Health Care (QA), Université Laval (CA), McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.