Corporate pandemic bonds

Purpose This paper aims to investigate why firms issue pandemic bonds. Specifically, it examines whether pandemic bond announcements have shareholder-value implications, whether pandemic bonds are associated with lower financing costs, and what mechanisms underlie these patterns. This study evaluates competing explanations, including signaling, cost-of-capital, pandemic-containment and government-support channels. Design/methodology/approach Using a comprehensive sample of corporate pandemic bonds issued in China during February–April 2020, this study examines stock-market reactions using an event-study methodology. Pricing effects are assessed by matching each pandemic bond to a comparable non-pandemic bond issued by the same firm and estimating yield-spread differences using fixed-effects regressions. Potential mechanisms are explored through analyses of signaling effects, pandemic-containment activities and government support, proxied by state-owned bank participation. Findings Pandemic bond announcements are associated with positive stock-market reactions, with cumulative abnormal returns ranging from 1.33% to 1.71%. Pandemic bonds also exhibit yield spreads that are 8.9–18 basis points lower than those of comparable conventional bonds. Yield discounts are more pronounced when a larger share of bond proceeds is allocated to pandemic-related activities and when state-owned banks participate more actively in bond offerings. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is among the first to systematically examine the corporate pandemic bond market and its implications for both equity-market reactions and bond pricing. It extends the literature on socially responsible debt beyond green bonds by evaluating a crisis-specific financing instrument. The findings highlight the potential role of state-owned bank participation in lower financing costs and suggest how capital markets may support public-policy objectives during periods of economic and public-health stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Economics and Finance
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-01-2026-0025
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Corporate pandemic bonds

Xiang Gao
Studies in Economics and Finance
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
article

Corporate pandemic bonds

Xiang Gao
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate why firms issue pandemic bonds. Specifically, it examines whether pandemic bond announcements have shareholder-value implications, whether pandemic bonds are associated with lower financing costs, and what mechanisms underlie these patterns. This study evaluates competing explanations, including signaling, cost-of-capital, pandemic-containment and government-support channels. Design/methodology/approach Using a comprehensive sample of corporate pandemic bonds issued in China during February–April 2020, this study examines stock-market reactions using an event-study methodology. Pricing effects are assessed by matching each pandemic bond to a comparable non-pandemic bond issued by the same firm and estimating yield-spread differences using fixed-effects regressions. Potential mechanisms are explored through analyses of signaling effects, pandemic-containment activities and government support, proxied by state-owned bank participation. Findings Pandemic bond announcements are associated with positive stock-market reactions, with cumulative abnormal returns ranging from 1.33% to 1.71%. Pandemic bonds also exhibit yield spreads that are 8.9–18 basis points lower than those of comparable conventional bonds. Yield discounts are more pronounced when a larger share of bond proceeds is allocated to pandemic-related activities and when state-owned banks participate more actively in bond offerings. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is among the first to systematically examine the corporate pandemic bond market and its implications for both equity-market reactions and bond pricing. It extends the literature on socially responsible debt beyond green bonds by evaluating a crisis-specific financing instrument. The findings highlight the potential role of state-owned bank participation in lower financing costs and suggest how capital markets may support public-policy objectives during periods of economic and public-health stress.

Studies in Economics and Finance
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Corporate pandemic bonds — Xiang Gao · Studies in Economics and Finance (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS