Governing AI Outcomes in Civil and Construction Engineering Education: Toward Trustworthy and Ethical Implementation

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming civil and construction engineering (CCE) education. CCE students must develop both AI technical proficiency and ethical awareness, ensuring that AI tools reflect the varied experiences of project clients. Integrating ethical AI instruction supports the formation of students’ professional identity by encouraging them to internalize values of responsibility, integrity, and equity in future practice. Adopting a narrative literature review, this paper examines the ethical concerns surrounding AI in CCE education, implications of existing regulations, and the need for institution-specific risk mitigation policies. The synthesis of the literature indicates that while integrating AI into CCE education may enhance learning experiences and personalized instruction, it also raises key ethical risks, such as algorithmic bias, privacy concerns, lack of transparency, threats to academic integrity, and digital inequity. As such, we also offer guidelines for responsible AI use in educational settings and propose an output governance framework and practical recommendations for educators and institutions, including performing regular ethical and algorithmic audits of AI tools, involving students in technology deployment decisions, and providing faculty development on digital ethics. By detailing actionable strategies, formalizing human-in-the-loop validation workflows, and preserving chains of provenance for educational metrics, these recommendations aim to align AI innovation with the core values of engineering education, i.e., integrity, equity, and public welfare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ai7090363
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Governing AI Outcomes in Civil and Construction Engineering Education: Toward Trustworthy and Ethical Implementation

Amir H. Behzadan, Armita Dabiri
AI
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Governing AI Outcomes in Civil and Construction Engineering Education: Toward Trustworthy and Ethical Implementation

Amir H. Behzadan, Armita Dabiri
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming civil and construction engineering (CCE) education. CCE students must develop both AI technical proficiency and ethical awareness, ensuring that AI tools reflect the varied experiences of project clients. Integrating ethical AI instruction supports the formation of students’ professional identity by encouraging them to internalize values of responsibility, integrity, and equity in future practice. Adopting a narrative literature review, this paper examines the ethical concerns surrounding AI in CCE education, implications of existing regulations, and the need for institution-specific risk mitigation policies. The synthesis of the literature indicates that while integrating AI into CCE education may enhance learning experiences and personalized instruction, it also raises key ethical risks, such as algorithmic bias, privacy concerns, lack of transparency, threats to academic integrity, and digital inequity. As such, we also offer guidelines for responsible AI use in educational settings and propose an output governance framework and practical recommendations for educators and institutions, including performing regular ethical and algorithmic audits of AI tools, involving students in technology deployment decisions, and providing faculty development on digital ethics. By detailing actionable strategies, formalizing human-in-the-loop validation workflows, and preserving chains of provenance for educational metrics, these recommendations aim to align AI innovation with the core values of engineering education, i.e., integrity, equity, and public welfare.

AIVol. 7(9)
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.