Bayesian updating with machine learning and geostatistics for posterior predictions of unconventional reservoir performance

Accurate forecasting of hydrocarbon production in unconventional reservoirs requires integrating spatial heterogeneity with well-scale geological and engineering data. Traditional machine learning regression approaches often neglect spatial context, including spatial continuity, spatial trends and data locations, resulting in potential overestimation of uncertainty. To address this limitation, we introduce a Gaussian Bayesian updating workflow that combines a secondary data collocated prior distribution of production with a geostatistical spatially informed conditional distribution using analytical Gaussian updating to estimate the posterior production distribution. The workflow is applied after normal score transformation of all features in Gaussian space to provide complete local uncertainty models from geostatistical kriging estimates and variances and to facilitate the use of closed-form analytical Bayesian updating. Our proposed workflow is demonstrated with 9 geological and 6 completion secondary features to forecast cumulative one-year oil production as the primary feature for an unconventional reservoir. A multivariate machine learning-based prior model is first calculated using local ridge regression with hyperparameter tuning to relate the secondary features to production. The geostatistical spatially informed conditional distribution is calculated by ordinary kriging based on an additive deterministic trend and residual estimation. Bayesian updating with K-fold cross-validation is then applied to tune the workflow, demonstrating a reduction of the high uncertainty of the prior model, yielding a posterior distribution that is both more accurate and precise than the machine learning or geostatistical distributions on their own.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Computing and Geosciences
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2026.100408
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian updating with machine learning and geostatistics for posterior predictions of unconventional reservoir performance

A. Thompson, M.J. Pyrcz, Dinghan Wang, J. T. Foster et al.
Applied Computing and Geosciences
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

Bayesian updating with machine learning and geostatistics for posterior predictions of unconventional reservoir performance

A. Thompson, M.J. Pyrcz, Dinghan Wang, J. T. Foster, Y. Lu
article en

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of hydrocarbon production in unconventional reservoirs requires integrating spatial heterogeneity with well-scale geological and engineering data. Traditional machine learning regression approaches often neglect spatial context, including spatial continuity, spatial trends and data locations, resulting in potential overestimation of uncertainty. To address this limitation, we introduce a Gaussian Bayesian updating workflow that combines a secondary data collocated prior distribution of production with a geostatistical spatially informed conditional distribution using analytical Gaussian updating to estimate the posterior production distribution. The workflow is applied after normal score transformation of all features in Gaussian space to provide complete local uncertainty models from geostatistical kriging estimates and variances and to facilitate the use of closed-form analytical Bayesian updating. Our proposed workflow is demonstrated with 9 geological and 6 completion secondary features to forecast cumulative one-year oil production as the primary feature for an unconventional reservoir. A multivariate machine learning-based prior model is first calculated using local ridge regression with hyperparameter tuning to relate the secondary features to production. The geostatistical spatially informed conditional distribution is calculated by ordinary kriging based on an additive deterministic trend and residual estimation. Bayesian updating with K-fold cross-validation is then applied to tune the workflow, demonstrating a reduction of the high uncertainty of the prior model, yielding a posterior distribution that is both more accurate and precise than the machine learning or geostatistical distributions on their own.

Applied Computing and GeosciencesVol. 32
Planetary Science Institute (US), Lander University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.