Global inequalities in weather forecasts

Abstract Weather forecasts provide substantial economic value for society, but differences in forecast accuracy across regions can potentially exacerbate existing—and create new—economic inequalities. These differences are particularly important given the role of weather forecasts in helping prevent damage from climate change. In this paper, we provide a global analysis of the accuracy of predictions of temperature and relate our findings to existing economic inequalities. We report two stylized facts: First, temperature forecasts are much more accurate in high-income countries compared to low-income countries. A seven-day-ahead forecast in a high-income country is, on average, approximately as accurate as a one-day-ahead forecast in a low-income country. Second, while forecast accuracy has improved steadily since 1985, a persistent gap remains between high- and low-income countries. These disparities result both from differences in the inherent scientific challenge of weather predictability across regions and from unequal weather observing infrastructure. Countries with lower income have fewer land-based weather stations and radiosondes as well as lower reporting rates from existing infrastructure. Low-income countries also appear to have lower institutional capacity to issue official, local weather forecasts. Remedying the differences in monitoring infrastructure could help reduce the gap in forecast accuracy between higher-income and lower-income countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-77630-w
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Global inequalities in weather forecasts

Jeffrey Shrader, Manuel Linsenmeier
Nature Communications
Climate variability and models
article

Global inequalities in weather forecasts

Jeffrey Shrader, Manuel Linsenmeier
article en

Abstract

Abstract Weather forecasts provide substantial economic value for society, but differences in forecast accuracy across regions can potentially exacerbate existing—and create new—economic inequalities. These differences are particularly important given the role of weather forecasts in helping prevent damage from climate change. In this paper, we provide a global analysis of the accuracy of predictions of temperature and relate our findings to existing economic inequalities. We report two stylized facts: First, temperature forecasts are much more accurate in high-income countries compared to low-income countries. A seven-day-ahead forecast in a high-income country is, on average, approximately as accurate as a one-day-ahead forecast in a low-income country. Second, while forecast accuracy has improved steadily since 1985, a persistent gap remains between high- and low-income countries. These disparities result both from differences in the inherent scientific challenge of weather predictability across regions and from unequal weather observing infrastructure. Countries with lower income have fewer land-based weather stations and radiosondes as well as lower reporting rates from existing infrastructure. Low-income countries also appear to have lower institutional capacity to issue official, local weather forecasts. Remedying the differences in monitoring infrastructure could help reduce the gap in forecast accuracy between higher-income and lower-income countries.

Nature Communications
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Princeton University (US), Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (DE), Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LU), High Meadows Environmental Institute (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global inequalities in weather forecasts — Jeffrey Shrader, Manuel Linsenmeier · Nature Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS