Social and economic inequalities in adult mortality in India

BACKGROUNDLow-and middle-income countries (LMICs) have limited evidence of adult mortality due to a lack of reliable data.We estimated social (caste and religion) and economic (wealth quintile) inequality in adult mortality using three rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS 1998-1999, NFHS 2015-2016, and NFHS 2019-2021). METHODSWe estimated the probability of death in the 15-59 age group by social and economic characteristics.We employed the Cox proportional hazards model to assess the risk of death associated with these characteristics, adjusting for other relevant predictors. RESULTSDisparities in adult mortality across social and economic groups have persisted for more than two decades, with only marginal reductions in social inequality.In India, the probability of death between ages 15 and 59 (45q15 per 1,000 persons) remains consistently higher among the socially disadvantaged Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) for both men and women.After adjusting for economic factors and regional heterogeneity, Cox proportional hazards models across NFHS rounds indicate that Muslim men have a lower hazard ratio of death than upper-caste Hindu men and that the elevated mortality risk among SCs and STs relative to upper-caste Hindu men is attenuated.Among adult women, upper-caste Hindu women demonstrate the lowest hazard ratios for adult mortality.Higher wealth status is strongly associated with lower mortality risk; individuals from the richest households experience substantially reduced mortality, approximately 60% lower for men and 40% lower for women compared with those from the poorest households across all survey periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Demographic Research
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2026.55.16
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social and economic inequalities in adult mortality in India

Nandita Saikia, Moradhvaj Dhakad
Demographic Research
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Social and economic inequalities in adult mortality in India

Nandita Saikia, Moradhvaj Dhakad
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUNDLow-and middle-income countries (LMICs) have limited evidence of adult mortality due to a lack of reliable data.We estimated social (caste and religion) and economic (wealth quintile) inequality in adult mortality using three rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS 1998-1999, NFHS 2015-2016, and NFHS 2019-2021). METHODSWe estimated the probability of death in the 15-59 age group by social and economic characteristics.We employed the Cox proportional hazards model to assess the risk of death associated with these characteristics, adjusting for other relevant predictors. RESULTSDisparities in adult mortality across social and economic groups have persisted for more than two decades, with only marginal reductions in social inequality.In India, the probability of death between ages 15 and 59 (45q15 per 1,000 persons) remains consistently higher among the socially disadvantaged Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) for both men and women.After adjusting for economic factors and regional heterogeneity, Cox proportional hazards models across NFHS rounds indicate that Muslim men have a lower hazard ratio of death than upper-caste Hindu men and that the elevated mortality risk among SCs and STs relative to upper-caste Hindu men is attenuated.Among adult women, upper-caste Hindu women demonstrate the lowest hazard ratios for adult mortality.Higher wealth status is strongly associated with lower mortality risk; individuals from the richest households experience substantially reduced mortality, approximately 60% lower for men and 40% lower for women compared with those from the poorest households across all survey periods.

Demographic ResearchVol. 55
International Institute for Population Sciences (IN), Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (DE)
European Commission, Max-Planck-Institut für demografische Forschung, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.