Data-Driven Validation and Correction of the Distortion Factor Estimated from Current Total Harmonic Distortion Using Industrial Field Measurements

In this study, the validity of the theoretical distortion factor based on total harmonic distortion of current (THDI) under industrial field conditions was evaluated, and low-complexity, data-driven correction models were developed to reduce formula error. The dataset was compiled from three-phase field measurements at 12 industrial measurement points. The measurement-based distortion factor was calculated from the PF/dPF ratio, while the theoretical distortion factor was calculated from the THDI-based equation. Since the phases at the same measurement point were not considered independent, the models were evaluated using a 12-cycle out-of-sample cross-validation method. The theoretical formula produced a mean absolute error of 0.015662, a root mean square error of 0.019681, and a mean bias of −0.009357. Among the compared models, restricted second-order regression produced the lowest error values, providing improvements of 31.83% and 15.70% in MAE and RMSE, respectively. Ridge regression, on the other hand, reduced the MAE to 0.012263 and brought the mean bias close to zero. However, the data-driven models did not reduce the maximum absolute error. At the measurement-point level, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test indicated lower paired errors after Ridge correction (P=0.0342), whereas the 95% bootstrap confidence interval for the mean paired MAE difference included zero. Taken together, these findings provide positive but limited evidence regarding the error-reduction potential of the Ridge correction. The results show that the THDI-based formula provides an interpretable initial estimate but cannot, on its own, account for field conditions such as phase asymmetry, load level, power factor, and voltage distortion. The proposed correction approach should be considered not as a universal formula but as an empirical calibration approach specific to the available field data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1997953
Primary Topic
Power Quality and Harmonics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Data-Driven Validation and Correction of the Distortion Factor Estimated from Current Total Harmonic Distortion Using Industrial Field Measurements

Faruk KÜRKER, Ramazan Taşaltı́n
Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science
Power Quality and Harmonics
article

Data-Driven Validation and Correction of the Distortion Factor Estimated from Current Total Harmonic Distortion Using Industrial Field Measurements

Faruk KÜRKER, Ramazan Taşaltı́n
article en

Abstract

In this study, the validity of the theoretical distortion factor based on total harmonic distortion of current (THDI) under industrial field conditions was evaluated, and low-complexity, data-driven correction models were developed to reduce formula error. The dataset was compiled from three-phase field measurements at 12 industrial measurement points. The measurement-based distortion factor was calculated from the PF/dPF ratio, while the theoretical distortion factor was calculated from the THDI-based equation. Since the phases at the same measurement point were not considered independent, the models were evaluated using a 12-cycle out-of-sample cross-validation method. The theoretical formula produced a mean absolute error of 0.015662, a root mean square error of 0.019681, and a mean bias of −0.009357. Among the compared models, restricted second-order regression produced the lowest error values, providing improvements of 31.83% and 15.70% in MAE and RMSE, respectively. Ridge regression, on the other hand, reduced the MAE to 0.012263 and brought the mean bias close to zero. However, the data-driven models did not reduce the maximum absolute error. At the measurement-point level, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test indicated lower paired errors after Ridge correction (P=0.0342), whereas the 95% bootstrap confidence interval for the mean paired MAE difference included zero. Taken together, these findings provide positive but limited evidence regarding the error-reduction potential of the Ridge correction. The results show that the THDI-based formula provides an interpretable initial estimate but cannot, on its own, account for field conditions such as phase asymmetry, load level, power factor, and voltage distortion. The proposed correction approach should be considered not as a universal formula but as an empirical calibration approach specific to the available field data.

Black Sea Journal of Engineering and ScienceVol. 9(5)
Adıyaman University (TR), Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University (TR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Power Quality and Harmonics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.