When is prosecution in the public interest?

Abstract Prosecutors in England and Wales may start or continue a prosecution only if to do so is in the public interest. No general account has previously been given, however, of what the public interest consists in. This paper aims to provide such an account, drawing on a study of all policies and guidance published by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Its principal conclusion is that, in most cases, CPS guidance imposes on prosecutors an obligation to seek an appropriate penalty for those against whom there is sufficient evidence. In more serious cases, this obligation effectively renders prosecution mandatory. In less serious cases, it may be outweighed by countervailing factors, and out-of-court disposals may constitute an appropriate penalty. However, only a limited range of factors are clearly recognised as counting against prosecution. CPS guidance also lacks clear principles regarding when prosecutors may exceptionally pursue non-punitive aims.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legal Studies
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2026.10137
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

When is prosecution in the public interest?

Andrew Cornford
Legal Studies
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

When is prosecution in the public interest?

Andrew Cornford
article en

Abstract

Abstract Prosecutors in England and Wales may start or continue a prosecution only if to do so is in the public interest. No general account has previously been given, however, of what the public interest consists in. This paper aims to provide such an account, drawing on a study of all policies and guidance published by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Its principal conclusion is that, in most cases, CPS guidance imposes on prosecutors an obligation to seek an appropriate penalty for those against whom there is sufficient evidence. In more serious cases, this obligation effectively renders prosecution mandatory. In less serious cases, it may be outweighed by countervailing factors, and out-of-court disposals may constitute an appropriate penalty. However, only a limited range of factors are clearly recognised as counting against prosecution. CPS guidance also lacks clear principles regarding when prosecutors may exceptionally pursue non-punitive aims.

Legal Studies
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.