Analyzing Test Items Using Difficulty Index and Discrimination Index for Evaluating Postgraduate Medical Residents

BackgroundThis study aimed to analyze objective questions used to evaluate Phase B residents in the Basics of Medical Education course in Bangladesh, focusing on standardizing test questions and identifying areas for improvement based on Difficulty Index (DIF I) and Discrimination Index (DI). MethodologyIn November 2022, 148 Phase B residents were examined by an internal assessment on the Basics of Medical Education.The assessment comprised 50 objective questions, including true/false (T/F) statements and fillin-the-gap exercises.Each correct answer received one mark.Following the assessment, item analysis was performed for validation, with data analysis conducted using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA). ResultsOut of 30 T/F statements, 40% were considered good/acceptable, with a mean DIF I of 76.17 and a standard deviation (SD) of 20.42; 60% were considered too easy.The overall mean (SD) DI for all T/F statements was 0.18 (0.13), with half displaying acceptable to excellent discriminatory capacity.For the 20 fill-in-the-blank statements, 40% were considered acceptable, with a mean (SD) DIF I of 64.80 (20.70) and a DI of 0.32 (0.18), indicating that 75% of these items had a good to excellent quality level. ConclusionFill-in-the-blank statements demonstrated exceptional discriminatory capabilities, but half of the T/F statements require significant refinement to enhance their quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.116220
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Analyzing Test Items Using Difficulty Index and Discrimination Index for Evaluating Postgraduate Medical Residents

Bijoy Kumer Paul, Marium Salwa, Jannatul Saki, Khandakar Fatema et al.
Cureus
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Analyzing Test Items Using Difficulty Index and Discrimination Index for Evaluating Postgraduate Medical Residents

Bijoy Kumer Paul, Marium Salwa, Jannatul Saki, Khandakar Fatema, Taslima Chowdhury, Kamrun Nahar, M Atiqul Haque
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to analyze objective questions used to evaluate Phase B residents in the Basics of Medical Education course in Bangladesh, focusing on standardizing test questions and identifying areas for improvement based on Difficulty Index (DIF I) and Discrimination Index (DI). MethodologyIn November 2022, 148 Phase B residents were examined by an internal assessment on the Basics of Medical Education.The assessment comprised 50 objective questions, including true/false (T/F) statements and fillin-the-gap exercises.Each correct answer received one mark.Following the assessment, item analysis was performed for validation, with data analysis conducted using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA). ResultsOut of 30 T/F statements, 40% were considered good/acceptable, with a mean DIF I of 76.17 and a standard deviation (SD) of 20.42; 60% were considered too easy.The overall mean (SD) DI for all T/F statements was 0.18 (0.13), with half displaying acceptable to excellent discriminatory capacity.For the 20 fill-in-the-blank statements, 40% were considered acceptable, with a mean (SD) DIF I of 64.80 (20.70) and a DI of 0.32 (0.18), indicating that 75% of these items had a good to excellent quality level. ConclusionFill-in-the-blank statements demonstrated exceptional discriminatory capabilities, but half of the T/F statements require significant refinement to enhance their quality.

Cureus
Bangladesh University (BD)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.