A study protocol of multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing three cannulated screws and dynamic condylar screw with medial anatomical buttress plate in treating old femoral neck fracture

Currently, there is no standardized consensus regarding hip preservation strategies for managing old femoral neck fractures. Our previously developed technique, utilizing a dynamic condylar screw (DCS), medial anatomical buttress plate (MABP), and iliac bone grafting (IBG), has been shown to reconstruct the proximal triangular structure, thereby providing adequate mechanical stability. The present study aims to establish a prospective cohort to evaluate the clinical outcomes of this combined technique in treating old femoral neck fractures. The old femoral neck fracture trial comparing DCS + MABP + IBG with three cannulated screws (TCS) + IBG is an ongoing multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial of 400 patients. Patients diagnosed with old femoral neck fractures are randomized either to DCS + MABP + IBG methods or to TCS + IBG surgery, with a single-blind design. The trial's primary outcome will be “fracture healing rate” assessed radiographically with 12 months of follow-up after surgery. Secondary outcomes include: (1) osteonecrosis of the femoral head, assessed with imageological examination; (2) hip function evaluated postoperatively and at final follow-up with the Harris Hip Score; (3) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess pain intensity in the hip and lower extremities; (4) complication monitoring, including surgical site infections, fracture redisplacement, implant loosening, and implant failure. This multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial aims to validate the efficacy and safety of medial augmentation technique (DCS + MABP) combined with autologous iliac bone grafting (IBG) for nonunion of femoral neck fractures. Successful implementation will establish a novel internal fixation strategy, enhancing clinical outcomes and reducing complication rates in the surgical management of old femoral neck fractures. This study was first approved by the Ethics Committee of the lead institution, Chinese PLA General Hospital (S2024-342-01), and was conducted simultaneously across multiple centers. All collaborating sites had to obtain approval from local ethics institutional review boards before initiating the respective controlled cohort studies. This study was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Medial Enhancement Technique for the Public Treatment of Old Femoral Neck Fractures, NCT06713031, registered on December 03, 2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06713031 ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09988-7
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study protocol of multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing three cannulated screws and dynamic condylar screw with medial anatomical buttress plate in treating old femoral neck fracture

刘志礼, Hua Chen, Meng Li, Zicheng Zhang et al.
Trials
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

A study protocol of multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing three cannulated screws and dynamic condylar screw with medial anatomical buttress plate in treating old femoral neck fracture

刘志礼, Hua Chen, Meng Li, Zicheng Zhang, Meng Cheng, Wei Zhang, Yu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Currently, there is no standardized consensus regarding hip preservation strategies for managing old femoral neck fractures. Our previously developed technique, utilizing a dynamic condylar screw (DCS), medial anatomical buttress plate (MABP), and iliac bone grafting (IBG), has been shown to reconstruct the proximal triangular structure, thereby providing adequate mechanical stability. The present study aims to establish a prospective cohort to evaluate the clinical outcomes of this combined technique in treating old femoral neck fractures. The old femoral neck fracture trial comparing DCS + MABP + IBG with three cannulated screws (TCS) + IBG is an ongoing multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial of 400 patients. Patients diagnosed with old femoral neck fractures are randomized either to DCS + MABP + IBG methods or to TCS + IBG surgery, with a single-blind design. The trial's primary outcome will be “fracture healing rate” assessed radiographically with 12 months of follow-up after surgery. Secondary outcomes include: (1) osteonecrosis of the femoral head, assessed with imageological examination; (2) hip function evaluated postoperatively and at final follow-up with the Harris Hip Score; (3) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess pain intensity in the hip and lower extremities; (4) complication monitoring, including surgical site infections, fracture redisplacement, implant loosening, and implant failure. This multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial aims to validate the efficacy and safety of medial augmentation technique (DCS + MABP) combined with autologous iliac bone grafting (IBG) for nonunion of femoral neck fractures. Successful implementation will establish a novel internal fixation strategy, enhancing clinical outcomes and reducing complication rates in the surgical management of old femoral neck fractures. This study was first approved by the Ethics Committee of the lead institution, Chinese PLA General Hospital (S2024-342-01), and was conducted simultaneously across multiple centers. All collaborating sites had to obtain approval from local ethics institutional review boards before initiating the respective controlled cohort studies. This study was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Medial Enhancement Technique for the Public Treatment of Old Femoral Neck Fractures, NCT06713031, registered on December 03, 2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06713031 ).

Trials
Nanchang University (CN), Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.