Pumped Hydropower versus Battery Storage Systems in Neom Mountains: A TOPSIS Analysis Approach

This study presents a comparative analysis between hydropower storage systems (HPSS) and lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) for large-scale energy storage in NEOM Mountain. The study is significant for engineering practices by bridging a literature gap in comparing two energy storage systems, HPSS, and LIBs, by evaluating their strengths and weaknesses through key metrics. The study employs TOPSIS to evaluate economic, environmental, social, and system sustainability impacts. The study was conducted by inviting 208 professionals working on the project to weigh the criteria and impacts through a survey. Data was calculated and analyzed in TOPSIS. Data showed that HPSS is the preferred choice. Despite the constraints faced, such as financial limitations and cultural considerations, this study provides valuable insights for sustainable energy decisions in NEOM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2026.22.79
Primary Topic
Microgrid Control and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pumped Hydropower versus Battery Storage Systems in Neom Mountains: A TOPSIS Analysis Approach

Nabil Semaan, Jihad Daba, Omar Samarji
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
Microgrid Control and Optimization
article

Pumped Hydropower versus Battery Storage Systems in Neom Mountains: A TOPSIS Analysis Approach

Nabil Semaan, Jihad Daba, Omar Samarji
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis between hydropower storage systems (HPSS) and lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) for large-scale energy storage in NEOM Mountain. The study is significant for engineering practices by bridging a literature gap in comparing two energy storage systems, HPSS, and LIBs, by evaluating their strengths and weaknesses through key metrics. The study employs TOPSIS to evaluate economic, environmental, social, and system sustainability impacts. The study was conducted by inviting 208 professionals working on the project to weigh the criteria and impacts through a survey. Data was calculated and analyzed in TOPSIS. Data showed that HPSS is the preferred choice. Despite the constraints faced, such as financial limitations and cultural considerations, this study provides valuable insights for sustainable energy decisions in NEOM.

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENTVol. 22
Lebanese University (LB), University of Balamand (LB), Islamic University of Lebanon (LB)
Responsible consumption and production, Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Microgrid Control and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.