Bridging MOE with eco-friendly chromatographic analyses of metformin and ursodeoxycholic acid with their official impurities: Multi-metric sustainability assessment

In response to the increasing demand for sustainable and reliable analytical approaches, this study presents the development of two environmentally friendly, selective, and robust chromatographic methods for the concurrent determination of metformin and ursodeoxycholic acid in the presence of their pharmacopeial impurities. HPLC-DAD method (Method I) employed C8 column using a gradient elution of phosphate buffer (pH 2.5), methanol, and acetonitrile, achieving baseline separation of seven analytes within 15 min at a detection wavelength of 210 nm. HPTLC method (Method II) utilized silica gel plates with a benign biobased mobile phase (ethyl acetate, ethanol, water, and acetic acid). It quantified Melamine and cyanoguanidine at 211 nm, metformin at 236 nm, and following derivatization with p-anisaldehyde, ursodeoxycholic acid and cholic acid at 533 nm. The proposed HPTLC method failed in complete separation of chenodeoxycholic acid and deoxycholic acid from ursodeoxycholic acid, whereas the HPLC-DAD method provided full resolution of all analytes. To rationalize the observed separation patterns, molecular docking simulations were performed using MOE software. Both methods were validated according to the guidelines of the International Council for Harmonization (ICH). They were successfully applied to laboratory made and spiked dosage forms without interference from excipients. Additionally, they were thoroughly assessed using multiple modern frameworks (tetra-color assessment), which collectively considered analytical performance, economic practicality, and eco-friendliness. The study also evaluated the alignment with the United States Sustainable Development Goals, confirming their status as sustainable, practical, cost-effective, and robust tools for routine quality control of the two drugs and their official impurities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2026.102553
Primary Topic
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Bridging MOE with eco-friendly chromatographic analyses of metformin and ursodeoxycholic acid with their official impurities: Multi-metric sustainability assessment

Amira H. Abo-Gharam, Yousef S. Mohamed, Dina S. El‐Kafrawy, Magdy M. Abdel-Khalek
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
article

Bridging MOE with eco-friendly chromatographic analyses of metformin and ursodeoxycholic acid with their official impurities: Multi-metric sustainability assessment

Amira H. Abo-Gharam, Yousef S. Mohamed, Dina S. El‐Kafrawy, Magdy M. Abdel-Khalek
article en

Abstract

In response to the increasing demand for sustainable and reliable analytical approaches, this study presents the development of two environmentally friendly, selective, and robust chromatographic methods for the concurrent determination of metformin and ursodeoxycholic acid in the presence of their pharmacopeial impurities. HPLC-DAD method (Method I) employed C8 column using a gradient elution of phosphate buffer (pH 2.5), methanol, and acetonitrile, achieving baseline separation of seven analytes within 15 min at a detection wavelength of 210 nm. HPTLC method (Method II) utilized silica gel plates with a benign biobased mobile phase (ethyl acetate, ethanol, water, and acetic acid). It quantified Melamine and cyanoguanidine at 211 nm, metformin at 236 nm, and following derivatization with p-anisaldehyde, ursodeoxycholic acid and cholic acid at 533 nm. The proposed HPTLC method failed in complete separation of chenodeoxycholic acid and deoxycholic acid from ursodeoxycholic acid, whereas the HPLC-DAD method provided full resolution of all analytes. To rationalize the observed separation patterns, molecular docking simulations were performed using MOE software. Both methods were validated according to the guidelines of the International Council for Harmonization (ICH). They were successfully applied to laboratory made and spiked dosage forms without interference from excipients. Additionally, they were thoroughly assessed using multiple modern frameworks (tetra-color assessment), which collectively considered analytical performance, economic practicality, and eco-friendliness. The study also evaluated the alignment with the United States Sustainable Development Goals, confirming their status as sustainable, practical, cost-effective, and robust tools for routine quality control of the two drugs and their official impurities.

Sustainable Chemistry and PharmacyVol. 53
Alexandria University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging MOE with eco-friendly chromatographic analyses of metformin and ursodeoxycholic acid with their official impurities: Multi-metric sustainability assessment — Amira H. Abo-Gharam, Yousef S. Mohamed, et al. · Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS