Evaluating the impacts of site preparation and fragment size on coral outplanting success at a highly degraded reef site

Coral reefs are deteriorating worldwide from the combined pressures of global climate change and local stressors. As such, reef restoration interventions are being applied to boost natural recovery and reef health. Outplanting success reported for restoration activities to date has been highly variable. This study evaluated factors that influence outplanting success at an impacted reef, including site preparation (cleaning substrate vs uncleaned) and outplant size for two coral species— Pocillopora acuta (branching) and Porites lutea (massive). To assess overall success, survivorship, health and growth of the two coral species were evaluated over a 170-day period. Survivorship differed between coral species, with P. lutea exhibiting higher survival probabilities than P. acuta (48.4 ± 7% and 13.6 ± 4% respectively). Low survivorship was largely driven by high dislodgement of coral outplants over the study period (39.58% to 70.83% of outplants dislodged for P. acuta and P. lutea respectively). Site preparation did not improve coral survival or health and all outplants exhibited algal growth at the end of the study. P. acuta outplants exhibited paling prior to P. lutea outplants, however, at the end of the study, all outplants except for medium (5–10 cm) P. acuta outplants exhibited similar levels of paling. Outplant size did not impact growth or survivorship. Overall, P. lutea showed the greatest suitability to outplanting at a degraded site with the highest survival and lowest dislodgement rates. In this study, high dislodgement rates limited outplanting success, indicating that alternative attachment methods and predator deterrents should be evaluated as a priority when using coral outplanting at heavily impacted reef sites. Results from this study demonstrate that not all species are equally suited to outplanting in impacted systems, and highlights the importance of matching species selection to site conditions to optimise restoration outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21725
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluating the impacts of site preparation and fragment size on coral outplanting success at a highly degraded reef site

Paige Strudwick, Christine Roper, Yi Jiang, Emma Camp et al.
PeerJ
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
article

Evaluating the impacts of site preparation and fragment size on coral outplanting success at a highly degraded reef site

Paige Strudwick, Christine Roper, Yi Jiang, Emma Camp, Kathryn A. Cobleigh
article en

Abstract

Coral reefs are deteriorating worldwide from the combined pressures of global climate change and local stressors. As such, reef restoration interventions are being applied to boost natural recovery and reef health. Outplanting success reported for restoration activities to date has been highly variable. This study evaluated factors that influence outplanting success at an impacted reef, including site preparation (cleaning substrate vs uncleaned) and outplant size for two coral species— Pocillopora acuta (branching) and Porites lutea (massive). To assess overall success, survivorship, health and growth of the two coral species were evaluated over a 170-day period. Survivorship differed between coral species, with P. lutea exhibiting higher survival probabilities than P. acuta (48.4 ± 7% and 13.6 ± 4% respectively). Low survivorship was largely driven by high dislodgement of coral outplants over the study period (39.58% to 70.83% of outplants dislodged for P. acuta and P. lutea respectively). Site preparation did not improve coral survival or health and all outplants exhibited algal growth at the end of the study. P. acuta outplants exhibited paling prior to P. lutea outplants, however, at the end of the study, all outplants except for medium (5–10 cm) P. acuta outplants exhibited similar levels of paling. Outplant size did not impact growth or survivorship. Overall, P. lutea showed the greatest suitability to outplanting at a degraded site with the highest survival and lowest dislodgement rates. In this study, high dislodgement rates limited outplanting success, indicating that alternative attachment methods and predator deterrents should be evaluated as a priority when using coral outplanting at heavily impacted reef sites. Results from this study demonstrate that not all species are equally suited to outplanting in impacted systems, and highlights the importance of matching species selection to site conditions to optimise restoration outcomes.

PeerJVol. 14
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.