Quantitative assessment of surface elemental and mineralogical effects on rock wettability: evidence from several rock types

Predicting rock wettability remains a fundamental challenge in petroleum reservoir characterization, directly impacting enhanced oil recovery strategies and remaining oil-in-place estimates. While mineralogy and surface chemistry are recognized as key controlling factors, their relative contributions and the mechanisms governing their influence remain poorly quantified, particularly in heterogeneous multi-mineral systems. This study systematically investigates the relationships between rock compositions, surface elemental chemistries, and wetting behaviors across diverse lithologies to address this knowledge gap. Using a combination of micro-X-ray fluorescence (µ-XRF) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and contact angle measurements on 126 rock samples representing seven major lithological units, multivariate statistical analysis was conducted to quantify and compare the predictive power of elemental composition versus bulk mineralogy. The analysis reveals highly significant associations between elemental compositions and wetting tendencies: increased water-wetting behavior correlates with enrichments in silicon (Si), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), titanium (Ti), cobalt (Co), rubidium (Rb), and phosphorus (P), while oil-wetting tendencies correlate with iron (Fe), arsenic (As), and bromine (Br). The logistic regression model based on elemental composition explains 79% of wettability variance (Tjur’s R² = 0.79), compared to only 23% for mineralogical composition (Tjur’s R² = 0.23). Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) confirms a highly significant effect for elemental profiles (F(2, 230) = 33.84, p < 0.001) versus non-significant effect for mineral profiles (F(2, 230) = 1.73, p = 0.179). Although calcite demonstrates a tendency toward oil-wetting and quartz toward water-wetting, these mineralogical relationships lack the statistical rigor observed in elemental correlations. The findings indicate that surface elemental composition shows a substantially stronger statistical association with wettability than bulk mineralogy under the conditions tested here (Tjur’s R² = 0.79 vs. 0.23) under ambient conditions. The novelty of this work lies in its comprehensive quantitative comparison across diverse lithologies, providing the systematic evidence that elemental composition significantly outperforms mineralogy in predicting wettability, with implications for reservoir characterization and enhanced oil recovery strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-026-02218-5
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Quantitative assessment of surface elemental and mineralogical effects on rock wettability: evidence from several rock types

Abduljamiu O. Amao, Emil von Rosen Vange, Theis Solling
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
article

Quantitative assessment of surface elemental and mineralogical effects on rock wettability: evidence from several rock types

Abduljamiu O. Amao, Emil von Rosen Vange, Theis Solling
article en

Abstract

Predicting rock wettability remains a fundamental challenge in petroleum reservoir characterization, directly impacting enhanced oil recovery strategies and remaining oil-in-place estimates. While mineralogy and surface chemistry are recognized as key controlling factors, their relative contributions and the mechanisms governing their influence remain poorly quantified, particularly in heterogeneous multi-mineral systems. This study systematically investigates the relationships between rock compositions, surface elemental chemistries, and wetting behaviors across diverse lithologies to address this knowledge gap. Using a combination of micro-X-ray fluorescence (µ-XRF) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and contact angle measurements on 126 rock samples representing seven major lithological units, multivariate statistical analysis was conducted to quantify and compare the predictive power of elemental composition versus bulk mineralogy. The analysis reveals highly significant associations between elemental compositions and wetting tendencies: increased water-wetting behavior correlates with enrichments in silicon (Si), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), titanium (Ti), cobalt (Co), rubidium (Rb), and phosphorus (P), while oil-wetting tendencies correlate with iron (Fe), arsenic (As), and bromine (Br). The logistic regression model based on elemental composition explains 79% of wettability variance (Tjur’s R² = 0.79), compared to only 23% for mineralogical composition (Tjur’s R² = 0.23). Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) confirms a highly significant effect for elemental profiles (F(2, 230) = 33.84, p < 0.001) versus non-significant effect for mineral profiles (F(2, 230) = 1.73, p = 0.179). Although calcite demonstrates a tendency toward oil-wetting and quartz toward water-wetting, these mineralogical relationships lack the statistical rigor observed in elemental correlations. The findings indicate that surface elemental composition shows a substantially stronger statistical association with wettability than bulk mineralogy under the conditions tested here (Tjur’s R² = 0.79 vs. 0.23) under ambient conditions. The novelty of this work lies in its comprehensive quantitative comparison across diverse lithologies, providing the systematic evidence that elemental composition significantly outperforms mineralogy in predicting wettability, with implications for reservoir characterization and enhanced oil recovery strategies.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.